Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

New litigation risk surfaces post-budget, election

shark
Miranda Brownlee
23 August 2016 — 1 minute read

As the ATO gears up to allow online access to taxpayers’ non-concessional contributions records, SMSF practitioners have been told to inform clients wishing to rely on ATO records that they do so at their own risk.

DBA Lawyers director Daniel Butler says no one should rely on the ATO records without examining those records against prior source documentation and information.

“Advisers should put each of their clients on notice that if they want to know what their prior NCCs have been [and] seek to rely on the ATO records, that they do so at their own risk,” he told SMSF Adviser.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The adviser should then recommend that a forensic examination be undertaken and checked against all the clients’ prior tax returns, super records etc. Until this examination has been undertaken, the adviser should not accept any risk that the ATO’s records are accurate and complete.”

Mr Butler warned that where the adviser relies on ATO records that prove faulty, resulting in losses for the client, the adviser will be liable for those losses.

He said figures from the ATO have been “found to be incorrect for a number of reasons on prior occasions”.

SMSF practitioners should give their clients the option of either relying on the ATO figures at the client’s risk, or offer to check and verify their contribution information for extra fees.

“Even though most clients may say to rely on the ATO information, advisers need to position themselves or assume risk for which they could be sued for,” Mr Butler said.

Conducting a thorough examination and confirmation of the client’s prior non-concessional contributions could cost $2,000 to $5,000 for some taxpayers, given the work that may be involved in some cases.

“This cost naturally does not reflect the ATO cost of producing the data,” Mr Butler said.

While the government has promised draft legislation on the superannuation measures by the end of the year, Mr Butler said this is likely to be delayed by consultation and implementation and “the big end of town getting computer systems tweaked”.

“Labor is on record of not approving this retroactive measure and the composition of the Senate also gives rise to even greater uncertainty.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

New litigation risk surfaces post-budget, election
shark
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.