Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Super proposals ‘a leaking sieve’, says lawyer

Super proposals ‘a leaking sieve’, says lawyer

droplet
Miranda Brownlee
26 July 2016 — 1 minute read

The raft of exemptions announced by the government for the $500,000 cap is giving rise to further complication and inequality, and could result in all retrospectivity being removed from the proposed change, claims a lawyer. 

DBA Lawyers director Daniel Butler says the concessions the government is seeking to carve out of the proposed legislation for the $500,000 cap will be difficult to apply in practice and will lead to “unnecessary and detailed analysis”.

“There have already been a number of concessions granted for the $500,000 lifetime cap. It’s getting to the point where there’s been so many concessions granted, one would think they’ll have to just simplify the process and just say it’s no longer going to be retrospective,” Mr Butler told SMSF Adviser.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Alternatively, the government could decide to remove all of the recently proposed exemptions.

“One way we can foresee this going is that the government will have to pull up stumps to simplify it by cutting out all of the concessions because there are too many holes in the sieve... there’s too much water leaking through the holes and it’s very inequitable,” Mr Butler said.

“[This proposal] was inequitable in the beginning but now it’s far more inequitable that these carve-outs have been proposed, if they were to proceed as proposed.”

Mr Butler said there are also concerns regarding the uncertainty around reversionary pensions, resulting from the $1.6 million cap.

“There’s uncertainty around whether a lot of mums and dads will be able to get a reversionary pension. It’s unclear whether if dad goes first, if the pension will be able to revert to mum, particularly where mum would exceed the balance cap,” he said.

“We need clarification very urgently because this is a hidden death tax in which the government, within the finer detail, is trying to hit people up with, without coming clean that they are introducing a new death tax.” 

 

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Super proposals ‘a leaking sieve’, says lawyer
droplet
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do any of your clients have related party LRBAs?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.