Several associations have joined forces to rally the government and point out the "fundamental flaws" in the government’s proposed superannuation policy.
The Australian Shareholders’ Association, Australian Investors Association, Small Independent Super Funds Association and the SMSF Owners’ Alliance have written to the prime minister, the treasurer and the assistant treasurer, outlining some fundamental issues with the government’s proposed super measures.
First, the associations believe the $1.6 million transfer balance cap applies retrospectively to transfers already made to pension accounts.
"If the transfer balance cap were to apply only to future retirees, savers can decide to change their retirement income strategy during their working life, working longer as necessary to ensure they have the standard of living in retirement they have anticipated," the associations stated.
"However, extending the cap to those who have already transferred all their savings into a pension account is retrospective in its impact."
Further, the associations believe the $500,000 cap on non-concessional contributions also has a retrospective effect.
"The new cap on on-concessional contributions should apply prospectively and not retrospectively back to 2007. In comments to a superannuation conference in Adelaide in February this year, the treasurer seemed to agree that retrospective changes to superannuation are unsettling and unfair," the associations stated.
In addition, the associations are requesting that upon retirement, individuals may make an additional non-concessional contribution above the $500,000 cap, provided their balance does not then exceed the transfer balance cap.
"There may be individuals who for whatever reason have been unable to make adequate concessional contributions but are prepared to top up their super using after tax funds (eg, from the sale of their house)," the associations stated.
"However, the new lifetime non-concessional contributions cap may restrict them from making their desired contribution even though this would not breach the overall balance transfer cap. This appears to be an unintended consequence and unfair on those who have been unable to make adequate concessional contributions."
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2016Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2016Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all