Speaking at Tax Institute event in Sydney last week, Ms O’Dwyer said the government is aware that certain individuals will be affected by the proposed changes to superannuation in the budget and plans to consult extensively on all legislation that it brings in prior to implementation.
The government she said has a clear commitment to that, particularly given that it is a "significant reform package".
"We know that there will be some people who will be caught by the changes, and we need to make sure where there are unintended consequences, that we are able to properly deal with those in the legislation," she said.
"We have taken a very conscious decision to exempt structured settlements and court orders for personal injury payments from both the $1.6 million transfer cap, and with the lifetime [$500,000] non-concessional cap," added Ms O’Dwyer.
Ms O’Dwyer said this was important as these sorts of payments were very important for people who have high health costs, and daily needs.
"That’s just one example I can give you," she said.
Last week, KPMG director Ross Stephens suggested this would be the case, noting he sees "no reason" why the carve out will not continue if the lifetime cap comes into effect.
Ms O’Dwyer argued that the coalition's reforms for superannuation overall will make the superannuation system "fairer for women and older Australians" and disputed the argument that the changes are retrospective.
"The government’s changes are all prospective, the government’s changes on the $1.6 transfer balance cap, apply prospectively from the first of July 2017, and on the $500,000 non-concessional lifetime cap," she said.
"We have made it very, very clear, that those people that contributed money after tax into superannuation before Budget night, are completely grandfathered."