One big four accounting firm has told the government it supports and recommends flexible superannuation contribution caps, and has also recommended changes to the concessional contribution arrangements.
In its submission to Treasury on the Objective of Superannuation consultation paper, KPMG recommended the introduction of lifetime limits to the amount individuals can maintain with the superannuation system.
“KPMG recommends the introduction of limited exemptions from concessional and non-concessional capping arrangements to allow women and low-income earners to boost their superannuation contributions to compensate for broken employment patterns, changed family circumstances, including divorce and financial separation, and reduced contributions generally,” the submission also said.
KPMG has also recommended the government reduce the annual income threshold at which the 15 per cent tax rate applies to concessional super contributions.
Further, the firm has recommended the government reduce the existing annual non-concessional contribution cap from $180,000 and restrict the ability to bring forward three years’ worth of non-concessional contributions.
Overall, KPMG stated it supports the primary objective of the superannuation system as recommended by the Financial System Inquiry, and believes that clarity of purpose will “aid consistent policy delivery and ultimately efficiency”.
The FSI outlined the primary objective of superannuation as to provide income in retirement to substitute or supplement the age pension.
“We support the objective being legislated and recommend that the objective of superannuation would be best placed in the preamble of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993,” KPMG stated.
“The recommended objective of the superannuation system recognises that the focus of the system is changing. This refocusing on retirement incomes is entirely appropriate and much needed,” KPMG added.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 22 Sep 2017ASIC permanently bans SMSF property spruikerBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says reportBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Sep 2017Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributionsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Sep 2017Lost and unclaimed super climbs to $18 billionBy Lara Bullock
- 21 Sep 2017ATO to release further guidance on reservesBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all
- Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says report
Male SMSF members tend to hold a greater share of assets in higher risk investments including domestic shares and property in comparison to ...read more
- Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributions
SMSF trustees planning to make downsizer contributions have been warned that if a property has been subject to a partial sale in the 10 yea...read more
- ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reporting
The ATO has been asked to provide further clarity around the events based reporting requirements for LRBA repayments, with the new requireme...read more
- view all