subscribe to our newsletter
Practitioners warned on traps with active asset reductions

Practitioners warned on traps with active asset reductions

Miranda Brownlee
19 February 2016 — 1 minute read

Applying an active asset reduction in some situations may not be as tax-effective as a retirement exemption and should be carefully thought through by practitioners, says one industry expert.

While applying the active asset reduction can mean another 50 per cent discount off capital gains tax after the general discount, if the asset is in a superannuation fund, there may be other more effective exemptions or reductions that can be applied, Cooper and Co.'s director, Gordon Cooper, explained at the SMSF Association conference.

“You need to think about whether you want to claim the active asset reduction,” said Mr Cooper.


“If you do claim it, you reduce the gain to 25 per cent. If the 25 per cent is less than the retirement exemption, you may be better off not claiming the active asset reduction so that you can get more money into a superannuation fund.”

It is also important to remember that while a share in a company title can be an active asset for CGT purposes, under the SIS regulations, the trustee must be a significant individual of that company.

“So the company title of the property would have to account for 20 per cent or more of the interest,” he said.

Read more:

‘Flimsy’ audits in ATO’s sights
AMP reports growth for SMSF arm

NSW woman charged following SMSF dealings

Practitioners warned on traps with active asset reductions
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

When do you plan to undertake the exam under the new adviser education standards?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.