Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Grattan Institute report on super slammed

Grattan Institute report on super slammed

Miranda Brownlee
15 December 2015 — 1 minute read

The SMSF Owners’ Alliance has criticised the Grattan Institute’s latest research report, claiming that its proposals will cause “rewards for effort to be redistributed unreasonably”.

SMSF Owners’ Alliance director of research Malcolm Clyde said the debate around superannuation reform is based on two very different views of the objectives of reform and this is clouding and confusing the discussion.

“One view is that there should be equal opportunity within society, with the progressive income tax structure and social security system being the drivers of redistribution to assist those who are truly vulnerable and unable to survive without such assistance,” said Mr Clyde.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“The other view is that the proceeds of one’s efforts should be distributed based on need using all possible means available to the government.”

Mr Hyde said the latter results in a “wilting economy with initiative and enterprise stifled”.

“Enthusiasm to strive fades if people perceive that their rewards for effort are redistributed unreasonably to others just because they have less,” said Mr Clyde.

He criticised the conclusions of the Grattan Institute report, stating they did not flow from the analysis and, at some points, actually contradicted the analysis.

“Presumably a super system will only be fair in the Grattan Institute’s eyes when everyone has the same result regardless of the effort they have made to work harder, forgo consumption and save,” he said.

Mr Clyde also criticised an assertion in the report that it “is unreasonable to expect the superannuation system alone to fund a comfortable living standard in retirement” and another conclusion that government funds may have more impact if they simply contribute to increasing the full age pension or rental assistance for pensioners.

“[This statement] appears to illustrate a lack of understanding of the cost-trade-offs between age pensions and tax concessions,” he said.

“The government has to provide 100 per cent of age pension funding but over 90 per cent of superannuation pensions are funded by an individual’s savings and earnings thereon, with the tax concessions just providing the incentive.”

Read more:

Limited licence threatens to 'strangle' accounting work 

First phase of SMSF offering launched for BT Panorama

Two thirds of Aussies short on retirement savings 

 

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Grattan Institute report on super slammed
default
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do any of your clients have related party LRBAs?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.