Some business owners falsely assume an SMSF can be used to protect assets in the face of other financial difficulties and are consequently making inappropriate property investments, one consultant has warned.
Speaking at the SMSF Association State Chapter event this week, Miller Super Solutions owner Tim Miller said he is seeing too many trustees acquiring residential property without adequately looking into the benefits of the specific property by considering where it is located and its capacity to provide returns.
“Where I’ve seen that lead to trouble is when clients have got financial difficulties outside [their SMSF] and see superannuation as a protection mechanism,” said Mr Miller.
In these situations, the client thinks that by buying the property via their SMSF it is protected from their other financial difficulties.
“This can be become very problematic because small business operators who have gone into bankruptcy with these limited recourse borrowing arrangements in place can then no longer act as trustee of their super fund,” he said.
“So they’ve got this illiquid asset that hasn’t reached it’s true value potential, they’re going through financial issues on the outside, and they have to actually remove themselves from the super fund.”
In these situations, it is more than likely the SMSF trustee will need to do a fire sale and effectively wind up their SMSF.
“The SMSF was probably only set up for the property in the first instance,” he added.
Mr Miller stressed how important it is that SMSF practitioners ensure their clients are investing in residential property through their SMSF for the right reasons.
“[Practitioners need] to discuss these issues with people to make sure they’re doing it for the right reasons," he said. "That they’re identifying the likely return from the property; they’ve investigated the re-sale value of other properties in the area; and that all those other issues are going to lead to a situation where there is at least some form of return.
“When you look at the overall return from a residential property versus the cost associated with it, it’s not that beneficial, from what I’ve seen,” Mr Miller said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 08:00Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 08:00Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all