Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

Government slow to act on ‘quick and dirty’ licensing courses

Miranda Brownlee
08 October 2015 — 1 minute read

CPA Australia has slammed the government for being too slow to respond to the poor quality of certain limited licensing courses on offer.

Speaking to SMSF Adviser, CPA Australia general manager of public practice Peter Docherty warned accountants they need to be wary of courses that claim to provide a diploma of financial planning in as little as two days.

“A lot of the courses in the marketplace are ‘quick and dirty’ courses that [only] allow them to sell products for a financial dealer group,” said Mr Docherty.

Advertisement
Advertisement

While this type of training course may be adequate if an accountant simply wants to align themselves with a particular dealer group, accountants who are attempting to use these courses to meet the education requirements for a limited licence through ASIC are set to have a “rude awakening”, he warned.

“ASIC is rejecting lots of applications – certainly with applications for the limited licence, one of the main instances where they’ve been rejected is because the knowledge requirements don’t comply with the minimum guidance,” Mr Docherty said.

Despite efforts by the Australian Skills Quality Authority to ramp up audits of some of the limited licensing courses on offer, Mr Docherty said the “government has been too slow to respond to bad quality”.

The response by Treasury to recommendations made by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services may, however, lead to better standards among education providers, he said.

“Any professional needs to be wary of any course that can provide you with a diploma of financial planning in two days – it just doesn’t make sense and it’s just not possible," Mr Docherty said.

“It’s very important, first of all, that accountants only take training with a registered training organisation, and actually ask the training organisation questions to ensure the training program being delivered meets all the minimum requirements that are established in the ATO regulatory guides RG146 and RG105 and etc.”

Read more:

Super a 'de-facto tax avoidance scheme'

NAB and Topdocs team up for new adviser service

BMR announces further integration with Class Super

 

 

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Government slow to act on ‘quick and dirty’ licensing courses
default
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.