New regulations, including the impending SMSF licensing regime, have seen accountants forced to “justify their existence” and are favourable for financial planners, according to one industry lawyer.
Speaking at a Sydney event, DBA Lawyers director Daniel Butler said some financial planners are now increasingly becoming registered to provide tax advice as ‘registered tax (financial) advisers’.
“That registration may not be a full-blown tax registration but they can talk about tax,” said Mr Butler.
“Some of them are now providing more compliance solutions in their financial planning practices – if you are referring clients to financial advisers you may want to check out the extent of their service.”
On the other hand, he said, accountants who provide traditional accounting services without an AFSL in areas such as business planning or the establishment of a company will need to provide evidence that proves the advice provided did not extend beyond the scope of these traditional services.
“That’s the regulation, and that’s why I’ve come to the conclusion generally that the planning community has won the turf warfare,” said Mr Butler.
“[Accountants] are on an island and have to justify their existence to give advice in traditional accounting services and again, this is where I’m saying the law hasn’t done you justice here if you are a mere accountant.”
Those accountants who plan to operate without an AFSL after 30 June 2016 are at risk if they stray off course. Therefore, they need to minimise their risk by ensuring all information about them that is available publicly indicates consistently that they have no licence nor do they provide financial planning advice, said Mr Butler.
He also recommended they provide appropriate disclaimers in written communications; clearly define scopes of engagements; file notes and confirmations of scope and disclaimers; and ensure there are no commissions or trail fees from financial planners.
While ASIC is unlikely to increase auditing in this area, Mr Butler said accountants face the risk of being sued by their clients if they provide advice that they are not authorised to provide.
“That’s what’s going to keep you honest – your clients or a competitor. If a competitor down the road finds out you’re giving this advice they’ll say, 'hey ASIC, look at this guy' and blow the whistle,” he said.
“The trouble is that as a professional you have to be not only clean but you have to look clean, so as a professional we generally have to be beyond reproach.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2016Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2016Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all