Accountants and advisers should collaborate more closely to achieve the best client outcomes, as SMSF practitioners may risk missing important details by taking on both roles, says one practice principal.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Sydney Financial Planning practice principal William Bracey said that given the complexity of both the financial advice and accounting sides of providing SMSF services, trying to combine the two may not lead to the best result for SMSF clients.
“For [SMSF practitioners] trying to be both accountants and financial planners, well good luck to them, because it’s such a huge area,” said Mr Bracey.
“It’s similar to me saying I’m going to be a doctor and I’m going to be a lawyer. If I’m a super brain I could do it, but realistically, how much am I missing out on every week unless I’m going to spend 30 hours a week studying – they’re kidding themselves, I think.”
Mr Bracey said accountants are now a lot more open to the idea of working with advisers and realise “it’s a minefield out there”.
“I really feel accountants have the best interests of their clients at heart,” he said.
“Generally, all the accountants I’ve ever met and spoken to I’ve been very impressed by. They have the same ethics as financial advisers and just want the best thing for their client.”
Mr Bracey also stressed the importance of SMSF practitioners working with lawyers to develop an appropriate estate plan for SMSF clients.
“The key is to work with a firm of solicitors or lawyers that you work regularly with and [to] whom you can articulate clearly what the client really needs,” he said.
“Generally speaking, lawyers won’t take the time to understand the financial side, so the structures they recommend may not be appropriate, but then again the structures that we recommend may not be appropriate from a legal point of view, so if you work together you get the perfect outcome.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 17 Aug 2017Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 17 Aug 2017Qld succession law changes tipped to impact SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 16 Aug 2017Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tierBy Staff Reporter
- 16 Aug 2017SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 15 Aug 2017SMSF auditor disqualified for misconductBy Staff Reporter
- 15 Aug 2017Class gains market share in financial year resultsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reporting
With events-based reporting set to generate huge amounts of data, concerns have been raised about whether the ATO’s systems will be able t...read more
- Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tier
Clients hoping to accumulate a superannuation balance of $1.6 million by age 65 will need to start taking full advantage of concessional con...read more
- SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reporting
A straw poll has revealed that the majority of SMSF firms currently feel their firm is not equipped to deal with the proposed events-based r...read more
- view all