Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
LRBA ban proposal an ‘overreaction’ to risk

LRBA ban proposal an ‘overreaction’ to risk

Miranda Brownlee
02 April 2015 — 1 minute read

The recommendation to ban direct borrowing in SMSFs is an “overreaction” to a poorly understood vulnerability in the Australian super system, according to the Financial Planning Association of Australia (FPA).

In its response to the final report of the Financial System Inquiry, the FPA said further information is needed on the actual and potential risks of limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBAs) in super.

The financial planning body also said the industry and government need to canvas alternative legal and policy solutions to address those risks.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Self-regulatory and co-regulatory mechanisms should be considered and constructed to the extent that a self-regulatory and/or a co-regulatory solution are appropriate to the systemic risk and the risk to consumers,” the association said.

In its response, the FPA recommended the government commission a review into leverage within superannuation with a focus on leverage within SMSFs.

The FPA said there are several matters the review should clarify in order to ensure that consumers are protected and systemic risk in the superannuation system is mitigated, including what the current exposure of SMSFs to LRBAs is and whether or not they are being used for short-term liquidity purposes.

The review should also look at how the financial services sector has responded to the risks tied to leverage within superannuation and to what extent personal guarantees “have circumvented the ‘limited recourse’ aspect of LRBAs”, the FPA said.

The response also made some suggestions regarding alternative solutions for addressing the “specific vulnerabilities stated in the FSI report”.

The FPA recommended prudential regulation of leverage in SMSFs and the use of product intervention powers for the distribution of SMSFs.

“For example, legislation could be implemented to prevent retail investors from commencing an SMSF without professional advice from a lawyer, accountant, or a financial planner,” the association said.

The FPA also said that property should be regulated as a financial product.

“Our view is that an outright ban on direct leverage in superannuation through limited recourse borrowing arrangements is unwarranted on the evidence currently available,” the FPA said.

“Serious and considered policy-making initiatives ought to be initiated in this space, while the regulators in this space (ASIC and the ATO) should adopt a regulatory strategy that responds to the consumer risk in the interim.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LRBA ban proposal an ‘overreaction’ to risk
default
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.