Implementing Joe Hockey’s proposal for using super in the purchase of a first home will further encourage “Australia’s misguided love affair with property” and damage retirement savings, says a financial services analyst.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Wealth Within chief analyst Dale Gillham said allowing people to purchase their first house with their superannuation savings will not be helpful in funding their retirement.
“People just borrow up to their limits, use their house to borrow even more and waste their money,” said Mr Gillham.
“Therefore we need to keep as much money in their super as possible, letting it compound and build up.”
Mr Gillham said superannuation money should stay as an investment for the future, as the family home is not about retirement.
“You’re not going to think about the family home from an investment point of view – buying a family home has nothing to do with retirement, it’s a lifestyle choice,” he said.
“To me, [this proposal] is a double-edged sword; the government plays with superannuation all the time resulting in never ending changes.”
Mr Gilham said while he understands the government wants to help younger people get into property, “Australians need to get smarter”.
“Australia’s love affair with property is very misguided. It’s actually far more profitable just to be a renter and invest in shares and property [you don’t live in] because of the tax deductions and the fact it’s a much better way to create wealth for retirement,” he said.
Having your own property with your name on the title, Mr Gillham said, is something Australians should get out of the habit of.
“It’s not actually very productive for you because all you’ve done once you sell the house at the end of a 30-year period is pay the capital cost into the house and the bank interest – it’s just enforced slavery.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 22 Sep 2017ASIC permanently bans SMSF property spruikerBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says reportBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Sep 2017Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributionsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Sep 2017Lost and unclaimed super climbs to $18 billionBy Lara Bullock
- 21 Sep 2017ATO to release further guidance on reservesBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all
- Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says report
Male SMSF members tend to hold a greater share of assets in higher risk investments including domestic shares and property in comparison to ...read more
- Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributions
SMSF trustees planning to make downsizer contributions have been warned that if a property has been subject to a partial sale in the 10 yea...read more
- ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reporting
The ATO has been asked to provide further clarity around the events based reporting requirements for LRBA repayments, with the new requireme...read more
- view all