subscribe to our newsletter

ATO outlines strategies for avoiding non-compliance

Miranda Brownlee
24 February 2015 — 1 minute read

Refusing to work with the ATO to resolve compliance matters is the “fastest way to have a non-compliance notice issued” says ATO director of SMSF risks and products Nathan Burgess.

Speaking at the SMSF Association conference last week, Mr Burgess said that while some compliance matters are too serious to avoid a non-compliance notice – such as those subject to wilful intent or extensive issues over an extended period of time – the ATO is trying to avoid handing down penalties through its new approach.

Mr Burgess said the phone calls from the ATO to SMSF trustees are not meant to be “We’ve got you calls”.


“We’re not looking to do it that way, we’re actually trying to avoid a formal audit of review, but in about one in ten funds it just has to be escalated – what I mean by that is during the phone call the person will absolutely refuse to deal with us and that gives us no choice,” he said.

Trustees who refuse to help the ATO resolve the issue or are simply too difficult, he said, are therefore more likely to have their fund made non-complying.

“We know there’s an issue and we’re trying to avoid [it] but we need the [trustee] to say 'Yes, I’m aware of it and we’re working on it',” he said.

Super Sphere director Belinda Aisbett said SMSF accountants and advisers need to ensure the client is fully across what they’ve done wrong and how it has been resolved.

Ms Aisbett said SMSF practitioners need to have a conversation with their client about the issue so that when they receive the call from the tax office they’re actually know what they’re talking about.

“You’ve got to do the right thing by your client and manage their risks – the last thing you want is your client to get all defensive on the line with the tax office and then have [the ATO] escalate it to an audit,” she said.

“If they escalate it to an audit and they confirm a contravention, then they have to issue fines, all because of one phone call, that could have gone a different way.”

Ms Aisbett said while one unit penalty doesn’t seem like a large amount of money, the number of units attached to a contravention can make it very costly for clients.


Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ATO outlines strategies for avoiding non-compliance
smsf logo
smsfadviser logo

Are you up to date with the legislative changes from 1 July? Contribution cap increases, super guarantees, age increases, SG rate increases. The budget announcement changes. Don’t be caught off guard by your clients’ questions. Prepare for any scenario with the SMSF Foundations course. 21 CPD hours available. Learn more

join the discussion

Latest poll

Do you have clients that are aged 65 or 66 planning to trigger the bring forward rules?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.