You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Banning LRBAs a ‘foolhardy reaction’

news
By mbrownlee
December 23 2014
1 minute read
4 View Comments

Banning borrowing in superannuation would be a knee-jerk reaction to “one man’s report,” according to the managing director of a Sydney-based advisory firm.

Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Omniwealth’s managing director Matthew Kidd said although the ATO is reticent to make sweeping changes to SMSFs, the FSI Report has brought lending in SMSFs firmly “under the microscope”.

Mr Kidd said there is also pressure from industry bodies as well as the retail and industry super funds to introduce greater legislation and regulation to the SMSF sector.

 
 

“Every year there’s a cry from the industry funds and retail funds that there needs to be more regulation,” said Mr Kidd.

“I look at that a bit cynically, I think he who yells loudest probably has the most to gain.”

Mr Kidd said while the government and ATO are likely to look at limiting the amount that can be borrowed with an SMSF, he says an outright abolishment of gearing in SMSFs would be a “foolhardy reaction” to any of the current issues associated with it.

“I think it would be a knee-jerk reaction to one man’s report and requests by the industry super funds and the larger retail super funds that are losing inflows to self-managed super,” he said.

“I believe there may be a need for more legislation, but you don’t swing the pendulum completely to the other side; there needs to be a happy balance.”

Mr Kidd said it is perfectly natural for the retail super and industry super companies to want to restrict inflows to SMSFs as they are essentially a threat to the inflows to their own funds.

He said the SMSF industry should hold off panicking about changes to borrowing in SMSFs just yet given that the changes may well not be implemented by the government.

“If we go back to the Henry Report in relation to the changes to the tax system, I think there were very few recommendations taken on board,” he said.

“Having said that there is definitely going to be some changes to the industry in the next year, if not the next couple of years.”

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (4)

  • avatar
    It seems to me mr Kidd is 'yelling fairly loudly' I agree with the Murray report:-

    In a scenario where there has been a significant reduction in the valuation of an asset that was purchased using a loan, trustees are likely to sell other assets of the fund to repay a lender, particularly if a personal guarantee is involved. As a result, LRBAs are generally unlikely to be effective in limiting losses on one asset from flowing through to other assets, either inside or outside the fund.
    0
  • avatar
    Perhaps if industry funds were able to invest member's money as holistically as SMSF trustee's, they wouldn't be so concerned about the SMSF sector and trying to change our rules.
    0
  • avatar
    I agree with Mr Kidd.

    He is yelling amongst the loudest who have most to gain.
    0
  • avatar
    Great Article, I agree with your logic and it is about time a balanced perspective was put forward rather than reading articles from those that only support getting rid of LRBA - most likely for their own interest and benefit and not for the Beneficiaries of the superfund.
    0
avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is 10MB. Only gif,jpg,png files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as