subscribe to our newsletter
Deloitte rejects minimum balances for SMSFs

Deloitte rejects minimum balances for SMSFs

Reporter
08 September 2014

There should be no minimum balance for setting up an SMSF and the government should not be directly concerned about the operating expenses of SMSFs, according to Deloitte.

In its second submission to the Financial System Inquiry, Deloitte said that in spite of concerns about high fixed costs relative to balances for smaller SMSFs, there should not be a minimum balance requirement for setting up an SMSF.

“There are practical difficulties on imposing limitations on the establishment of SMSFs,” Deloitte stated.

“The real issue is the appropriateness of the recommendation by advisers for consumers with lower asset levels to use a SMSF.”

Deloitte also stated that allowing SMSFs to use direct leverage creates competitive non-neutrality in the superannuation system.

“Restoration of the general prohibition on direct leverage of superannuation funds improves competitive neutrality and limits the tax advantages of superannuation to funds that have been saved and not borrowed,” Deloitte stated.

Deloitte rejects minimum balances for SMSFs
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super