Westpac has suggested there is evidence that supports the need for limitations on SMSF set-up and that the level of analysis of the systemic implications of the SMSF sector is “insufficient”.
In its response to the Financial System Inquiry’s interim report, Westpac said suitability remains the most important policy consideration in relation to SMSFs.
“In light of the complexity, ongoing administration and unique risks, Westpac encourages the Inquiry to consider the introduction of appropriate additional regulatory requirements before an SMSF is able to be established,” the submission stated.
Westpac said the bank supports the requirement for a clearer test to be satisfied before the establishment of an SMSF can be recommended.
The test would require an adviser or accountant to be satisfied the benefits from the establishment of the SMSF clearly outweighed the risk and complexity relative to an APRA-regulated structure, Westpac said.
“Given the unique structure and risks attached to SMSFs, consideration should be given to higher qualification and accreditation requirements for advisers in this area.”
Westpac also said the current level of oversight and analysis of the systemic implications of the SMSF sector is insufficient, given the sector’s size and continuing growth rate.
“This poses important issues for the government and SMSF members, including risk of shortfalls in retirement savings due to poor management and/or mismanagement; calls to compensate SMSF members in the event of a failure; and poor understanding of the economic and financial system implications of the sector,” Westpac stated.
Westpac said this lack of oversight is “compounded” by the typically poor quality and depth of official data in relation to SMSFs.
The bank also acknowledged that there are systemic benefits to a large unleveraged superannuation savings pool, which can act as a stabiliser in times of economic stress.
However, Westpac stated it believes the current take-up of borrowing by SMSF’s is a “rational” response to the current policy and tax settings.
“Any change to the requirements surrounding leverage, like any others in superannuation, should operate on a prospective basis – consistent with the interim report’s policy option,” Westpac stated.
“Should the Inquiry decide not to remove direct leverage, we encourage the Inquiry to instead consider how appropriate caps – at an SMSF level – can be introduced to ensure leverage does not become a systemic risk.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 23 Aug 2017'No apparent benefit' in ATO position on ECPIBy Katarina Taurian
- 23 Aug 2017Transfer balance cap confusion posing risks for practitionersBy Miranda Brownlee
- 23 Aug 2017TBAR reporting tipped to expose illegal adviceBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Aug 2017Contentious views on segregation locked inBy Katarina Taurian
- 22 Aug 2017Contributions spike for 2016-17 financial yearBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Aug 2017ATO targeting illegal retirement schemesBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Transfer balance cap confusion posing risks for practitioners
Confusion around certain aspects of the transfer balance cap could be leading some practitioners to provide advice to clients based on premi...read more
- view all