subscribe to our newsletter

ATO reiterates non-compliance approach

05 June 2014 — 1 minute read

With the start date for the new penalty powers regime now less than one month away, the ATO has issued a reminder of the various ways it can deal with SMSF trustees that have not complied with superannuation law.

In a statement released yesterday, the ATO reiterated it has the power to disqualify an individual from acting as a trustee or director of a corporate trustee if they have contravened super laws.

“When deciding whether to disqualify a trustee, we take into account how serious the contraventions are, how many contraventions have occurred and how likely it is they will continue to be non-compliant,” the ATO stated.


The ATO also reminded trustees it may apply through the courts for civil or criminal penalties to be imposed. These penalties apply where trustees have contravened provisions concerning, for example, the sole purpose test, the borrowing rules and the in-house asset rules.

The ATO may also give a trustee or investment manager a notice to freeze an SMSF’s assets where it appears that conduct by the trustees or investment manager is likely to adversely affect the interests of the beneficiaries to a significant extent.

“This is particularly important when the preservation of benefits is at risk,” the ATO stated.

From 1 July 2014, individual trustees and directors of corporate trustees are personally liable to pay an administrative penalty if they contravene certain provisions of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993, the ATO reiterated.

The value of each penalty unit is $170 and the penalty cannot be paid or reimbursed from the assets of the fund.

ATO reiterates non-compliance approach
smsf logo
smsfadviser logo

Become a pro at SMSF fundamentals and make your clients bulletproof with the SMSF Foundations course. Earn up to 21 CPD hours, and learn directly from Aaron Dunn from Smarter SMSF as he deep-dives into the fundamentals you need to know to successfully undertake your work as an SMSF practitioner. Learn more

join the discussion

Latest poll

Do you have clients that are aged 65 or 66 planning to trigger the bring forward rules?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.