subscribe to our newsletter
‘Stringent’ draft tax determination withdrawn

‘Stringent’ draft tax determination withdrawn

Katarina Taurian
12 December 2013

The ATO has withdrawn a draft taxation determination labelled “stringent” by the SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia.

Draft tax determination TD 2013/D7 was withdrawn yesterday, according to a notice issued by the ATO.

"[TD 2013/D7] provided circumstances of where an asset of a complying superannuation fund are segregated current pension asset[s] under section 295-385 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997," said the SMSF Academy's Aaron Dunn.

The draft determination explained the Commissioner’s preliminary view about when an asset of a complying superannuation fund is invested, held in reserve or otherwise being dealt with for the sole purpose of enabling a fund to discharge liabilities payable in respect of superannuation income stream benefits, the ATO stated.

“A number of submissions were received during the course of consultation and it became clear that approaches vary materially across the industry,” the ATO added.

“A new determination dealing specifically with the key issue of bank accounts will be issued in the near future, and the ATO will further consider and consult on the balance of the matter.”

The SMSF Professionals’ Association of Australia (SPAA) made a submission to the ATO regarding the draft determination.

“SPAA believes that the draft tax determination clarifies any doubt as to when an asset of a superannuation fund can be a segregated current pension asset,” the submission stated.

“However we believe that the draft [determination] is too stringent in [its] limitations on how superannuation funds can hold their assets and when a fund must apply the segregated pension.”

“We also believe that the limitations on segregating assets in TD 2013/D7 will mainly affect superannuation funds holding non-fungible assets such as real property and bank accounts, discriminating against superannuation funds that hold those assets as investments.”

‘Stringent’ draft tax determination withdrawn
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do you support the government’s proposal to change the annual SMSF audit requirement to three years for members with clean audit history?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super