Industry bodies are calling for more stringent licensing conditions for practitioners involved in advising on investment products to SMSF trustees.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has called for mandatory AFS licensing for practitioners involved in the sale of investment products to SMSFs.
In a statement released this week, ASFA chief executive Ms Pauline Vamos said the association has become increasingly concerned about the growing number of people being targeted by schemes which offer attractive incentives at the expense of long-term good retirement objectives.
“Such schemes run the risk of falling foul of the sole purpose test that applies to all SMSFs. As well, provision of large incentives indicates that a property is not being sold at a fair market price,” she said.
“With more and more people entering the SMSF sector each day, it's critical the regulators address the growing concern the community has around its governance, and ensure professionals working in this area are licensed appropriately.”
ASFA said the licensing – or lack thereof – of the SMSF sector is a major concern, given reports of SMSF members being “offered luxury international holidays in exchange for buying property through their fund”.
Similarly, the Superannuation Professionals' Association of Australia has called for more stringent licensing requirements in relation to limited recourse borrowing arrangements.
“We wanted limited recourse borrowing to be a licensed product under the Corporations Act,” SPAA’s Jordan George told SMSF Adviser.
“Making limited recourse borrowing itself as a financial product would provide more certainty around licensing and who can advise on the investment strategy.”
The calls follow the Property Investment Professionals of Australia’s (PIPA’s) persistent lobbying for property to be classed as a financial product when the purpose of sale is for investment.
Ben Kingsley, chair of PIPA, previously told SMSF Adviser this would be a positive move, providing “better protection for trustees of SMSFs”.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 22 Sep 2017ASIC permanently bans SMSF property spruikerBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says reportBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Sep 2017Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributionsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Sep 2017Lost and unclaimed super climbs to $18 billionBy Lara Bullock
- 21 Sep 2017ATO to release further guidance on reservesBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all
- Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says report
Male SMSF members tend to hold a greater share of assets in higher risk investments including domestic shares and property in comparison to ...read more
- Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributions
SMSF trustees planning to make downsizer contributions have been warned that if a property has been subject to a partial sale in the 10 yea...read more
- ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reporting
The ATO has been asked to provide further clarity around the events based reporting requirements for LRBA repayments, with the new requireme...read more
- view all