Retirees are likely to remain “in the red” despite the bumper year for superannuation returns, according to Challenger.
Figures from Chant West earlier in the month, reported in SMSF Adviser's sister publication InvestorDaily, showed a default fund return of 15.5 per cent in the 2012/2013 financial year, the second highest financial year return in the last 16 years and the fourth consecutive positive result.
Despite the strong result, Challenger chairman of retirement income Jeremy Cooper said that retirees would be unlikely to see any boost in their fund balances.
“Strong investment returns in 2013 may be good news for super savers but more than a million Australian retirees are still likely to be in the red,” Mr Cooper said.
“A four year avenge of 8.8 per cent per annum after the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) is great if your money has been locked away but it’s just not enough if you’ve been using your super for its intended purpose of providing income in retirement.”
“Because they’ve been drawing income each year, retirees are earning this sort of return on a lower capital base after being hit by the GFC.”
“They are highly unlikely to ever recover their GFC capital losses,” he added.
Chant West said that the median growth fund reach 10.5 per cent above its pre-GFC high in 2013 and that the result shows “the importance of maintaining your strategy even in the most difficult times like the depth of the GFC. “
Mr Cooper said that 1.1 million Australians are drawing retirement income from account-based pensions which are super funds switched from accumulation to drawdown mode.
This means that in market downturns, retirees in account-based pensions have to deal with the eroding capital as well as the impact of the drawdowns they need to live on.
“I’m not advocating that investors try to time the market, but given the poor sequence of returns faced by retirees living on their super during the GFC, they may have been better off if they’d switched to defensive or conservative investment options beforehand to avoid the double whammy, said Mr Cooper.
“The vulnerability of retirees to volatility is the main reason why investing in retirement is different.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 22 Sep 2017ASIC permanently bans SMSF property spruikerBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says reportBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Sep 2017Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributionsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Sep 2017ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Sep 2017Lost and unclaimed super climbs to $18 billionBy Lara Bullock
- 21 Sep 2017ATO to release further guidance on reservesBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all
- Male SMSF investors ‘bigger risk takers’, says report
Male SMSF members tend to hold a greater share of assets in higher risk investments including domestic shares and property in comparison to ...read more
- Lawyer flags subdivision trap with downsizer contributions
SMSF trustees planning to make downsizer contributions have been warned that if a property has been subject to a partial sale in the 10 yea...read more
- ATO urged to address ‘unknowns’ with LRBA reporting
The ATO has been asked to provide further clarity around the events based reporting requirements for LRBA repayments, with the new requireme...read more
- view all