Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
ATO reveals appeal decision for Aussiegolfa case

ATO reveals appeal decision for Aussiegolfa case

ATO Australian Taxation Office
Miranda Brownlee
09 October 2018 — 1 minute read

The ATO has announced its decision on whether it will appeal the Full Federal Court decision for Aussiegolfa Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Commissioner of Taxation, a major SMSF case relating to the sole purpose test.

An ATO spokesperson has today confirmed that the Commissioner will not be seeking special leave to appeal the Full Federal Court decision in Aussiegolfa Pty Ltd (Trustee) v Commissioner of Taxation [2018] FCAFC 122 in respect of the sole purpose test.

The Full Federal Court of Australia handed down its judgement on the case in August, and concluded that the leasing of a residential property held by a sub-fund, of which the SMSF was invested, to the daughter of the SMSF member, was not a breach of the sole purpose test.

Advertisement
Advertisement

This was an appeal to an earlier judgement by the Federal Court, which upheld the commissioner’s determination that the fund had breached the sole purpose test.

The ATO said it is aware that there has been some media commentary that the decision by the Full Federal Court changes the application of the sole purpose test to SMSF dealings with related parties.

“However, the Full Federal Court emphasised that its decision with respect to sole purpose test was dependent on the factual arrangement being considered, and a different set of circumstances may have led to a different outcome,” the ATO stated.

“We are currently considering whether our views on sole purpose test in Self-Managed Superannuation Funds Ruling SMSFR 2008/2 should be clarified in light of the Court’s observations.”

The ATO also noted that the arrangement was still found to be in contravention of the in-house asset test and therefore ineffective from a regulatory perspective.

The ATO confirmed that it will provide its views on both aspects of the decision when it issues a Decision Impact Statement.

SMSF technical experts have flagged concerns recently that the court decision may entice some SMSF trustees to push the boundaries with the sole purpose test.

“It would be wrong to go out and think there’s now a change in the law and that it’s okay for the member to start receiving a personal benefit from the assets of the fund,” Mr Burgess cautioned at a recent conference.

“What we don’t know in this case is whether the outcome would have been different if the trustees, when they decided to invest, were aware of the personal benefit that the member may get.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

ATO reveals appeal decision for Aussiegolfa case
ato signage ad
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.