Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
subscribe to our newsletter

Risk of contravention with overpayment of trust distributions

Risk of contravention with overpayment of trust distributions
By miranda-brownlee-momentummedia-com-au
12 August 2022 — 1 minute read

SMSFs have been warned that where a unit trust has overpaid a distribution to an SMSF unit holder that this can, in some instances, be considered a borrowing

Speaking in a recent DBA webinar, DBA Lawyers senior associate Shaun Backhaus said sometimes situations will arise where a unit trust overestimates its distributions for the year and over pays, resulting in the SMSF unit holder receiving more income than its entitlement.

Determining whether this means the SMSF has borrowed from the unit trust and therefore contravened section 67 in this situation will depend on a range of factors, explained Mr Backhaus.

While there isn’t always a simple answer, Mr Backhaus said SMSF professionals looking at what the Commissioner’s interpretation of a loan is may help them to determine if it is in fact a borrowing.

“In SMSFR 2009/2, the Commissioner talks about what a loan is. It includes the provision of credit or any other form of financial accommodation whether or not enforceable, or intended to be enforceable, by legal proceedings,” he noted.

“It's pretty broad and also goes through a fair bit of case law. It states that there are a few necessary features including a temporary transfer of an asset from a lender to a borrower and an obligation or intention to return the temporarily transferred asset to the lender.”

Mr Backhaus said practitioners and clients in this situation should look at what the unit holders agreement or unit trust deed says.

“Is the overpayment a CGT event and you’ve reduced your cost base? Is it something that has to be paid within a time limit that would probably make it a loan?” he said

“Could you make resolutions to show that there’s not an intention to repay it? What’s happened in the past? If there’s been unpaid present entitlements in the past and they’ve been repaid each time then that probably shows an intention to repay it and it is probably a loan.”

Mr Backhaus said where it is a related trust that’s involved it's more likely to be considered a loan.

“That’s not necessarily the case, but where you’ve got a related trust that does bring issues to the forefront."

 

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning