In Sydney yesterday, Mr Bowen held firm on his party’s claims that budgetary gains from Labor’s planned reformation of excess dividend imputation credits will come from the top 20 per cent of taxpayers “and SMSFs in particular”.
The SMSF and tax professions have produced several opinions and calculations to the contrary, including from SuperConcepts’ manager for technical services and education, Peter Burgess.
“It seems to me that this measure could actually allow the rich to accumulate more in super,” Mr Burgess told SMSF Adviser in late March.
“Transferring some of their pension balance to the accumulation phase may allow them to use all of their franking credits. The effect will be more retained in super for longer, as they can draw down super from accumulation phase when they need it rather than being forced to take the minimum pension each year,” he said.
Mr Bowen also suggested Labor’s policy exemption for pensioners was partly influenced by a scare campaign, as opposed to sound reasoning that pensioners would be adversely affected by the planned changes.
“The political problem facing us is that the vast majority of pensioners were unaffected, 90 per cent of Australians were unaffected, but because of scare campaigning many thought they were affected,” Mr Bowen said.
“That means you’re not cutting through with your argument, and it’s an important argument to win, so sometimes leadership’s about listening as well to recover that slightly,” he said.
Speaking broadly, Mr Bowen said Labor will table changes to superannuation outside of tax, including gender-equality measures.
The opposition will also not be supporting any further delays to increasing the superannuation guarantee. It currently stands at 9.5 per cent, with a planned staged increase to 12 per cent by 2026.
“There’ll be changes, absolutely, and necessary changes in our view,” Mr Bowen said.
editor@smsfadviseronline.com.au
Apparently Mr Bowen doesn’t understand simple arithmetic.
The message doesn’t get through because the ALP is not honest in its delivery. Start from the basis that, in their view, SMSFs are a direct threat the Industry Funds and that is why they keep using them as a tax cash cow. Perhaps people would be more prepared to listen to their proposals if they cleared that one out of the way.
I would back Mr Burgess’ before any politician when it comes to calculations or anything on superannuation.