X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Additional ID checks causing SuperStream rollover delays

The SMSF Association has expressed concern that additional ID checks being imposed by APRA-regulated funds beyond the SuperStream standards are impeding the efficiency of the new SuperStream regime.

by Miranda Brownlee
December 23, 2021
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

From 1 October this year, the SuperStream standards became mandatory for all rollovers to and from SMSFs. The new standards require a trustee to roll over or transfer an amount no later than three business days after the trustee received the rollover or transfer request, or if the trustee requires further information, the date the trustee receives that information.

SMSF Association deputy chief executive Peter Burgess said the new SuperStream system is not working as efficiently as the association would like, with rollovers not occurring in the prescribed three days.

X

“We are somewhat concerned by some of the APRA-regulated funds that seem to be taking a long time to roll money to SMSFs, even where the request complies with the SuperStream standards,” explained Mr Burgess.

Mr Burgess said there are situations happening where the trustee has done everything correctly under the SuperStream rules but the APRA fund is still imposing ID checks on the trustee, which are unnecessary in some cases.

“We understand that with cyber-security being such a big issue, it’s important that the APRA-fund does make sure that the money is transferred to the correct bank account but I think we have to have a balance in place,” Mr Burgess told SMSF Adviser.

“Where there is a match in the data that they’re receiving from the ATO and it matches their own data, then there shouldn’t be a need for further checks.”

Mr Burgess said there is further work that needs to be done in this area.

“We need to get the right balance between checks which ensure there is no risk of fraud, but at the same time, doesn’t impose unreasonable requirements on SMSF trustees,” he said.

 

Related Posts

PBR takes hard line on death benefit dependant criteria

by Keeli Cambourne
December 18, 2025

In a recent private binding ruling (1052395100997) the commissioner found the beneficiary applicant was not in an interdependent relationship nor...

MYEFO reveals super tax revenue predicted to fall $600m next year

by Keeli Cambourne
December 18, 2025

Treasury released its mid-year update yesterday with figures revealing the changes to the $3 million super tax legislation and the...

Two choices for tax purposes with lump sum disability payment

by Keeli Cambourne
December 18, 2025

Mark Gleeson, senior technical manager for MLC, said on a recent webinar that those choices are either taking a disability...

Comments 1

  1. Kris Kitto says:
    4 years ago

    I’ve had to deal with hundreds (yes hundreds) of SuperStream rollover requests since 1 October 2021. Teething problems were expected and encountered, but the arrogant attitude of industry super funds when it comes to complying with SIS Regulations I’ve encountered is disgusting.

    Industry Super Funds didn’t want this change, fought against it, got it delayed and now it’s in finally place they’re basically ignoring it and making up their own rules that directly go against the Regulations.

    APRA needs to take them to task. ID verification is the first issue. Electronic verifications of member identities needs to be made mandatory. Forcing members to send physical copies of ID via snail mail is an intentional delay tactic and doesn’t reduce the risk of fraud.

    The second issue is verifying SMSF bank details. Providing a bank statement (or equivalent confirmation letter) can only be asked for to confirm that the account details for payment, not as another excuse to delay payment or to meet their ‘internal policies’.

    Gloves are off. AFCA complaints lodged, APRA informed. They MUST be pulled into line!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited