X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

‘A slap in the face’: Big backlash to more mandatory training continues

Consultants to accountants and advisers are finding that their clients are increasingly considering exiting SMSF advice, on the basis that they will have to spend thousands to complete training they’ve already done.

by Katarina Taurian
June 15, 2018
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

As reported, incoming mandatory education requirements have SMSF Adviser readers and parts of the profession up in arms.

Advisers to small business, in particular, are finding that their clients are re-assessing the commercial viability of their SMSF offering, on the basis that they will have to complete up to three units of tertiary-level study to provide limited SMSF services, when they’ve already completed extensive studies.

X

“The Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) has not taken into consideration an accountant’s extensive years of practical experience and knowledge,” said director at Ariel & Associates, Jeremy Danon.

“A bridging course covering the new standards and the Code of Ethics is a slap in the face for those accountants who have extensive experience, possess appropriate qualifications and accreditations and are required to complete at least 120 hours of continuing professional developed each triennium.

“At the very least, current CAANZ and CPA accountants should be grandfathered, with new entrants having to undertake the required units.”

For Bronny Speed, who runs training and consulting business AccountantsIQ, both she and her clients “are not convinced” that further tertiary study is necessarily a way to improve standards.

“Instead, it would be really helpful to be giving practical training and guidance in relation to the Corporations Act and the regulatory and legal environment in which we work,” Ms Speed told SMSF Adviser.

Similarly, Licensing for Accountants chief executive Kath Bowler said it’s clear that cultural imperatives are a significant driver of ethics outside of tertiary training.

“That’s certainly what we have seen from the royal commission,” Ms Bowler told SMSF Adviser.

“It seems to not be a practical approach. Culture has a much bigger impact on ethics than education in some of these environments.”

The Financial Planning Association, which has toured the country seeking feedback, has found members into the thousands think the guidance is out of step with their qualifications and industry experience.

FPA chief executive Dante De Gori, who stressed the guidance remains in consultation phase, said there is “definitely frustration” in the wider profession.

“Everyone just wants certainty,” Mr De Gori told SMSF Adviser. “We are ready to go and do the study, but we need to know what that is.”

katarina.taurian@momentummedia.com.au

Tags: News

Related Posts

Draft legislation move away from ‘sector neutrality’

by Keeli Cambourne
December 22, 2025

Peter Burgess, CEO of the SMSF Association, said the government did not have much choice but to release the draft...

SMSF auditor numbers decrease according to ATO statistics

by Keeli Cambourne
December 22, 2025

Data reveals that from 2019-20 to 2023-24 the number of auditors specialising in SMSF has decreased from 4,773 to 2,942....

RM Capital and SMSF Club ordered to pay $925,000 in penalties

by Keeli Cambourne
December 22, 2025

The penalties follow a court finding in February 2024 that RM Capital had failed to take reasonable steps between August...

Comments 1

  1. Massive O'Dwyer re-educations says:
    8 years ago

    O’Dwyer and her political buddies along with FASEA need an Ethics course first.
    Then a degree in bloody common sense.
    O’Dwyer and FASEA are looking for force $10K plus in education costs and a time cost of 360 hrs at $330 / hr = $119K.
    So for already having a Economics degree, Full DFP 1-8, SMSF Specialist and Financial Adviser Estate planning specialist, 20 years CPD, 20 years experience and still not qualified.
    So let’s go spend $130K on re-education. FASEA you are a joke.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited