subscribe to our newsletter

New mandatory training ‘not reasonable’ for SMSF professionals

meeting 2 382
Katarina Taurian
20 March 2018 — 1 minute read

SMSF professionals operating under a limited licence will have to complete the same training as those under a full licence under incoming education laws, sparking furious reactions from accountants fatigued by ongoing changes to the AFSL regime. 

The new standards, to be set by the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA), will apply to those licensed to provide financial advice from 2024.

Those with a bachelor’s degree in a related field - accounting, financial planning or advice, business, commerce, law or economics - will need to complete a bridging course of three study units to meet these standards.


The new guidance does not distinguish between those operating under a limited licence and a full AFSL, meaning accountants providing basic SMSF advice will be - as it stands - expected to do the same training as those providing holistic advice.

“SMSF professionals are not distinguished in any way,” Kath Bowler, chief executive of Licensing for Accountants, explained to SMSF Adviser.

“SMSF professionals tend to come from either an accounting or a financial planning background and it is that background that seems to be taken into account, rather than SMSF qualifications or designations they may hold. If they are from an accounting background, they are likely to need to do three additional units of study,” she said.

The scope of advice given under a limited versus full AFSL is vastly different, and as such, principal at Ariel & Associates Jeremy Danon believes it’s “definitely not reasonable” to group the education requirements of all licensed advisers together.

“I believe that it is important to distinguish between those ‘financial advisers’ operating under a limited AFS licence,” Mr Danon told SMSF Adviser.

“Recommending and organising the creation of an SMSF is part of an accountant’s duties and responsibilities in regard to the financial health and wellbeing of a client. It is the accountant who recommends whether a client’s business or activities would operate best under a trust, SMSF, company or sole trader structure,” he said.

“For something that was traditionally their domain, accountants are being lumped with all other financial planners with no exemption or grandfathering relief,” he added.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.



New mandatory training ‘not reasonable’ for SMSF professionals
meeting 2 382
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.