X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home Strategy

The annuities vs pensions battle

The GFC has given retirees good reason to drop their swords and reassess annuities as an alternative to an account-based pension (ABP).

by Michael Hallinan
December 18, 2013
in Strategy
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

With the proposal to provide the same tax treatment to deferred annuities as applies to super from 1 July 2014, dismissing an annuity based on inhospitable taxation will not be an option.

A deferred lifetime annuity is essentially an income stream with a deferred commencement date (that is, purchased now for payment from the date on which the recipient reaches a particular age etc).

X

Currently, earnings derived from an annuity during the deferral period are subject to greater tax than earnings derived during the accumulation phase of super. The proposal for annuities seemingly evens the playing field.

Annuities are a lump sum payment to the company in exchange for either life or a fixed term and are a guaranteed fixed annual income. They are offered by APRA-regulated companies and generally cost more than ABPs because operational costs and risks are assessed at the time of commencement by the provider.

The purchaser can also choose to have no money left or a particular amount paid back at the end of a fixed term.

ABPs are an income stream from investments which require a minimum drawdown each year in accordance with the SIS regulations, and can start or stop (be commuted).

The ABP can offer lump sum withdrawals, and generally costs less than annuities because purchasers do not pay premiums to cover risk associated with the guaranteed payments.

Case study

Annuities appeal to someone such as Budgeter Bob.

If the market moves favourably, Bob is locked in and misses out. His peers may be reaping the rewards of the market while Bob receives his usual income.

Bob may have purchased an indexed annuity to safeguard against inflation but this will be the extent of increased payments. If the market moves unfavourably, then Bob is protected.

If Bob dies a month after the annuity begins, there are a couple of options. If he did not buy a reversionary annuity or an annuity with a minimum payment term, then the annuity provider keeps the lot. If the annuity was bought as reversionary or with a minimum payment term, then Bob’s spouse or dependent could receive the payments until the term ends.

But, if the company providing the annuity goes belly up, then Budgeter Bob is not covered by the government protection for certain deposits with banks.

ABPs, meanwhile, are likely to appeal to Fast Eddie.

If the market moves favourably, then Eddie – depending on the investment strategy and holdings of the super fund – may reap the rewards, and can increase pension payments or take a lump sum.

If the market moves unfavourably, then Eddie may need to reassess his investment position to continue receiving the same income. Worst-case scenario: Eddie will need to reduce his income.

If Eddie dies a month after commencement, then there are a few options depending on how the pension was set up (reversionary, or the residual is payable under a binding death benefit nomination or to his estate and pursuant to his Will). If nothing specific is in place, it will be paid pursuant to the rules in the fund’s trust deed.

If the market moves unfavourably, Eddie must draw the minimum annual amount required for an ABP, which may deplete his already reduced capital.

If Fast Eddie wants to safeguard against the next GFC, or if Budgeter Bob wants more flexibility for a lump-sum drawdown, then they could consider splitting retirement savings into an annuity and into the concessional super fund environment.

Michael Hallinan, special counsel, Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers

Related Posts

David Saul, managing director and CEO, Saul SMSF

Deposit bonds and SMSFs: A hot market, a cold compliance shock

by David Saul managing director and CEO Saul SMSF
November 27, 2025

Australia’s property market remains one of the most competitive in the world. With scarcity driving prices higher, we’re now seeing...

Revised Div 296 super tax still misses the mark

by Naz Randeria, director, Reliance Auditing Services
November 22, 2025

The government’s revised Division 296 superannuation tax will create unnecessary complexity, drive up costs, and pave the way for a...

Abject failure to seize control of over $200M of trust assets a lesson in what not to do

by Matthew Burgess, director, View Legal
November 20, 2025

There are three foundational principles in modern Australian trust law that are universally true, and a recent legal decision highlights...

Comments 2

  1. Dr Terry Dwyer says:
    12 years ago

    Why on earth would anyone take up an annuity with a fixed interest rate when-
    1. interest rates are at historic lows; and
    2. QE is building up for big loss of currency value?

    The time to buy annuities was in the Volcker years.

    Asset based pensions built on equities seem a much better deal so long as one reserves capital gains to meet capital losses.

    And if I wanted a flexible annuity I would look to an overseas insurer. Some of them offer much better deals with less taken out as management fees and commissions.

    Reply
  2. Marvin Stewart says:
    12 years ago

    All of the indexed annuities with income riders I work with allow the balance of the annuity to go to a designated beneficiary in the event of the annuitant’s death a month after the policy is sold. The statement”the annuity provider keeps the lot” should be revisited as this is not case with indexed annuities which have now become the leading annuities sold in the market per LIMRA, replacing variable annuities in that regard.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited