X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Super for housing policy labelled ‘confusing’

An SMSF firm has questioned the government’s decision to mix housing policy with superannuation through the First Home Super Saver Scheme and believes other incentives and rebates should have been explored.

by Jotham Lian
January 10, 2018
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

From 1 July 2018, the FHSSS will allow first home buyers (FHBs) to access voluntary superannuation contributions, along with associated earnings, made from 1 July 2017.

HLB Mann Judd director Andrew Yee has questioned the wisdom of allowing a retirement savings system to be used in purchasing property, instead of offering other forms of tax incentives.

X
“I think just mixing up first home housing policy and superannuation becomes a bit muddled up. I think policy needs to be separated,” said Mr Yee.

“If you are trying to encourage superannuation savings and then you’re trying to use that for housing policy, I think it just becomes a bit confusing.

“My opinion is that it is better to have them separate and therefore taking the incentives out of superannuation system and making it more from an income tax point of view, policy or other tax incentives can be implemented,” he added.

“Maybe [the government] can offer a tax deduction or a tax rebate for the first home buyers and maybe that tax rebate is capped at a certain amount or it could be offered over a certain period over the life of the loan.”

Mr Yee also hit back at recent suggestions from the Real Estate Institute of Australia (REIA), calling for the government to allow FHBs to access contributions prior to 1 July 2017.

“I guess there’s a benefit because the contributions have already been made but I think I’d probably prefer to stick to the original date of the legislation for contributions made after 1 July 2017,” said Mr Yee.

“It would be cleaner, more efficient. If you go pre-July 2017, you’re sort of being retrospective in some respect, whereas after 1 July 2017, you know what is going to the superannuation and it’s easier to comply with the legislation and administer for the practitioners and the government as well.”

Tags: News

Related Posts

PBR takes hard line on death benefit dependant criteria

by Keeli Cambourne
December 18, 2025

In a recent private binding ruling (1052395100997) the commissioner found the beneficiary applicant was not in an interdependent relationship nor...

MYEFO reveals super tax revenue predicted to fall $600m next year

by Keeli Cambourne
December 18, 2025

Treasury released its mid-year update yesterday with figures revealing the changes to the $3 million super tax legislation and the...

Two choices for tax purposes with lump sum disability payment

by Keeli Cambourne
December 18, 2025

Mark Gleeson, senior technical manager for MLC, said on a recent webinar that those choices are either taking a disability...

Comments 1

  1. Anonymous says:
    8 years ago

    The simple rationale is that historically the majority of Australian’s hold most of their wealth in property, not to mention home ownership eases the retirement burden (compared to renting). Allowing people to use super for home ownership basically just shifts where the assets are held.

    That said I agree with the sentiments above. It is poor policy.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited