X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

SMSFs at risk of ‘lawyer feeding fest’

One prominent industry lawyer has expressed serious concern about the state of SMSF documentation as the dominance of new business models grows.

by Katarina Taurian
October 16, 2015
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Managing principal of Argyle Lawyers, Peter Bobbin, doubts the ability of online document providers to confidently structure estate planning strategies for an SMSF.

“The two do not match. There is no such thing as a ‘standard’ non-binding or binding nomination – it just doesn’t [exist],” Mr Bobbin told SMSF Adviser.

X

“The average account balance in an SMSF, as in total assets, now exceeds a million. And yet somebody is promoting the idea that you spend $85 or $120 to run off a nomination document which is going to control up to $1.1 million. I think it’s ridiculous, I truly think it’s ridiculous. I don’t understand it,” he said.

“The only fortunate thing about it is that in 98 per cent of cases, the general society’s morality is such that they will follow what the deceased said.”

DBA Lawyers has voiced similar concerns to SMSF Adviser.

“When you get things over the internet, to put it lightly, there can be difficulties,” said director Bryce Figot.

“There’s a lot of other things out there where you enter your data into a website that spits the documents right back at you, which raises this very nasty question about, number one, garbage in and garbage out. If the person doesn’t know what instructions to enter, they might answer things incorrectly,” he said.

Mr Figot particularly takes umbrage at models that have minimal or no input from a qualified lawyer.

“There are time savings; however, people then take it to the next level, saying ‘well, why don’t we get the documents instantly populated back at us’, and that’s where you’ve got no lawyer reviewing it,” Mr Figot says.

In a previous conversation with SMSF Adviser, Topdocs director Michael Spakman expressed confidence in the online model of SMSF documentation but warned about the inherent legal risks of incorrectly drafted documents.

“At the end of the day, they’re still legal documents, there’s still risk associated with that, and we want to be able to protect the client and make sure that what they get is fit for purpose,” Mr Spakman said.

“Their responsibility is providing advice for their client; the document provider’s responsibility is to give something fit for purpose which also they assume the risk for,” he said.

Read more:

Liberals best bet to fix super taxes, says fund manager 

New shadow minister tipped to bolster SMSF sector 

Tags: News

Related Posts

The super powers of SMSFs do not extend to enabling early access: legal expert

by Keeli Cambourne
December 3, 2025

Matthew Burgess, director of View Legal, said the decision in Santavas and Commissioner of Taxation (Taxation) ARTA 2515 highlights the...

Peter Johnson

Accountants need to provide proof of asset ownership too: adviser

by Keeli Cambourne
December 3, 2025

Peter Johnson, director of Advisers Digest, said the ATO has updated their ruling on ownership and separation of fund assets,...

ASIC reminds advisers of deadline for education requirements

by Keeli Cambourne
December 3, 2025

ASIC has reminded financial advisers who are existing providers and intend to provide personal advice to retail clients about relevant...

Comments 1

  1. Gary Lindsay says:
    10 years ago

    Typical comment from a self-interested practitioner.
    There are well publicised and well known requirements for binding death nominations. That’s the point – they’re well known. Anyone can write one, you don’t need to have a law degree or even pay a computer $120 to do one over the internet. You just have to make sure it’s done correctly, all the i’s are dotted, and all the t’s are crossed.

    SMSF Trustees can run their funds on their own, that’s what the first two letters in SMSF stand for! They don’t need lawyers putting their fingers in the pie.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited