X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home Strategy

SMSF auditors under the spotlight

The ATO’s Michael Zeitlhofer tells Katarina Taurian why the ATO has been targeting the SMSF auditing process and what auditors should be considering and focusing on in light of this.

by SMSF Adviser
September 19, 2014
in Strategy
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Is auditor activity a key focus for you at the moment?

The main advantage that we now see is that the registration process is now enabling us to understand and know who the auditor population is, and that’s assisting on a number of fronts.

X

We can target and identify auditors who potentially aren’t doing what they should be doing, but also it’s enabling us to work with ASIC and the industry.

We are seeing now a maturing of the profession and the number of auditors has dropped off to just over 7,000 now; we’re seeing the average number of audits being undertaken by auditors increasing up to around 50.

The ATO has said it is now going to be addressing every single auditor contravention report that is sent its way. What part of that process has changed and why?

You may be aware the ATO across a number of its areas… looks to operate in a risk-differentiated environment where we’re trying to focus most of our efforts on the high-risk areas with the more high visibility and have different strategies for lower risk problems.

Now in the SMSF market, the information that we’re capturing… it’s feeding into a risk-based model that then gets matched up with other information that we hold about the trustees. Ultimately, that allows us to better risk differentiate the trustees to low, medium and high funds and from that information, we’re now going to be much better placed to target the activities.

For example, a low-risk SMSF doesn’t really warrant a full audit; it’s expensive for us and it’s expensive for the client. That sort of approach might be to write them a letter and highlight to them a couple of areas that we’ve got a problem [in].

A medium risk might be a phone call and a conversation and ultimately the high-risk funds would get a comprehensive audit that may lead to sanctions and penalties being applied.

The other real advantage with the information… it enables us to understand areas where we think SMSF trustees are having the most problems. So from that information we can then look at what are the services and products that we need to provide.

There’s been a lot of noise in the marketplace about low-cost audits. Does the ATO have any concerns about low-cost audits?

It is a factor, but I wouldn’t be saying that it is a number one issue. There’s also concerns raised in the past about the number of audits that you might be conducting, but clearly if it doesn’t look like it’s commercially reasonable for an auditor to do a comprehensive job then it would raise some concern.

Is there any message the ATO would like to send directly to SMSF auditors?

We still have concerns about some of the underlying problems that keep coming up in SMSFs. Loans, in-house assets, separation of assets, so the key contraventions that continue to be around in the industry at the trustee level.

We continue to get a high percentage of the contraventions in those areas and our advice [is] to continue having auditors to continue to work with the trustees to identify those areas and highlight to the trustee where they’ve got these sorts of problems and continue to report them through to us, and that then enables us to work with the auditors to get to those contraventions or those problems and have them rectified appropriately.

We’re continuing to target the education of trustees and as you know, we’ve got the new penalty regime around education and rectification directions where we’re keen to support industry by following up with trustees where they’re not doing the right thing, and so we’re hoping that those sort of problems start to become less and less over time.

Related Posts

Revised Div 296 super tax still misses the mark

by Naz Randeria, director, Reliance Auditing Services
November 22, 2025

The government’s revised Division 296 superannuation tax will create unnecessary complexity, drive up costs, and pave the way for a...

Abject failure to seize control of over $200M of trust assets a lesson in what not to do

by Matthew Burgess, director, View Legal
November 20, 2025

There are three foundational principles in modern Australian trust law that are universally true, and a recent legal decision highlights...

Understanding NALI: what you need to know in 2025

by Craig Stone, general manager, quality and technical services. Super Concepts
November 15, 2025

The ATO’s focus on non-arm’s-length income (NALI) and expenditure (NALE) continues to sharpen, and the legislative framework has evolved again...

Comments 1

  1. Phillip Woodhill says:
    11 years ago

    SMSF auditing and SMSF regulation in particular has been a can of worms and the regulators had problems with the initial drafting and understanding of the system. Initially they allowed any accountant to be the auditor which opened the door to faulty audits and rorts. With the introduction of experienced and suitably qualified auditors now that area has been tightened and cleaned up. Also weak was the advisory side of SMSF was full of commission driven white shoe salesmen who did not have the clients best interest at heart. Super was supposed to be simple but the mass of regulatory changes showed otherwise. The concept has now changed from an incentive based system of tax concessions meant to encourage employees to save for their retirement to a system where everyone involved including some of the contributors wants to earn a few dollars from the ever growing huge pile of money in the pot. Perhaps better control of the pot may be the answer?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited