X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Notion of SMSF compensation levy rejected

A vast majority of respondents to an SMSF Adviser survey have said there should not be a compensation levy in place for SMSF investors.

by Katarina Taurian
November 26, 2013
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In response to the question ‘Should there be a compensation levy in place for SMSF investors?’ 85.3 per cent of the 197 straw poll respondents answered ‘no.’ The remaining 14.7 per cent said there should be a compensation levy in place.

Partner at HLB Mann Judd Michael Hutton told SMSF Adviser he disagrees with the notion of a compensation scheme for SMSF investors, saying trustees are typically aware of their level of responsibility.

X

“SMSFs are typically set up by people wanting to have control over and flexibility with their superannuation arrangements. These investors are typically more engaged with what is happening with their superannuation and as a result are more aware of what is going on,” Mr Hutton said.

“Trustees are responsible for the investment strategy of their fund and the investment decisions that they make. Most take on this responsibility knowingly and happily.

“To have a compensation scheme and associated levy is, I believe, overregulation.”

However, Paul Sholl, partner at Austin’s Financial Solutions, told SMSF Adviser a “last resort compensation scheme” accessible by SMSF investors has merit but he does not believe this should be funded through a levy on SMSFs.

“A levy for all SMSF investors will disadvantage the majority of trustees who comply with the regulations and make appropriate and sound investment decisions… If a compensation scheme is to be provided, we believe it should be funded by the industry providing the investment,” Mr Sholl said.

“Why should individual investors be required to fund the acts of those they have placed their faith and trust in when investing their money. If the industry is unable to provide adequate protection then why should it be left up to their customers to provide it for them?”

Tags: News

Related Posts

Banned SMSF auditor charged with continuing to act whilst disqualified and falsifying documents

by Keeli Cambourne
November 26, 2025

Kristian John Convery was disqualified on a permanent basis by ASIC effective from 15 May 2024. ASIC alleges that between...

Aaron Dunn, CEO, Smarter SMSF

Becoming a member of an SMSF is easy, but there are other things that need to be considered​​: expert

by Keeli Cambourne
November 26, 2025

Aaron Dunn, CEO of Smarter SMSF, said there has been a lot of discussion lately around trustee and member changes...

Peter Johnson, director, Advisers Digest

Lending money to members will breach SMSF compliance: adviser

by Keeli Cambourne
November 26, 2025

Peter Johnson, director of Advisers Digest, said section 65 stipulates that a fund cannot lend to a member or a...

Comments 2

  1. James J says:
    12 years ago

    Most SMSF Trustees are more awake than most people seem to think….”mentally inadequate politicians”..I like that John.

    Reply
  2. john G says:
    12 years ago

    If a compensation scheme existed the next alteration to rules many would try to con their mentally inadequate politicians into allowing would be betting on horse races or investing in lottery tickets etc.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited