X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

FASEA urged to fix confusing wording in standards

The SAFAA has urged for the need to better clarify option 1 ahead of changes to FASEA’s contentious Standard 3.

by Tony Zhang
November 29, 2021
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In its submission to the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) on proposed changes to Standard 3 of the Code of Ethics, Stockbrokers and Financial Advisers Association (SAFAA) said that whilst it supported the option 1 changes, FASEA should also adopt its own wording describing the intent of the Standard, rather than the convoluted wording it has put forward.

“SAFAA has long expressed concern about the wording of Standard 3 and sought its revision,” Judith Fox, SAFAA CEO, said.

X

“The current wording of Standard 3 prohibiting a financial adviser from advising, referring or acting in any other manner where they have a conflict of interest or duty is unworkable in practice, particularly in light of the lack of a test of materiality or proportionality.

“The correct legal and ethical position is that it is only when a client’s interests cannot be prioritised that the conflict must be avoided.’’

SAFAA points out that FASEA has captured this correct approach in its own wording used in the intent to the Standard, which is: “Advisers must not advise, refer or act in any other manner where they have a conflict of interest or duty that is contrary to the client’s best interests.” 

However, this wording is not used in Option 1 put forward by FASEA as part of its 11th-hour consultation on Standard 3. FASEA has instead put forward torturous wording in Option 1 to get to the same result.

“We welcome FASEA putting forward an option that clarifies that a conflict of interest only exists when the adviser acts in a manner contrary to the client’s best interests,” Ms Fox commented. 

“We support Option 1. But we query why the proposed wording needs to be more complex and less accessible than FASEA’s intent.”

Ms Fox added that the aim is to be as clear and concise as possible to facilitate compliance with the Standard. 

“We urge FASEA to provide less complex wording by using its own language in the intent,” she explained.

“This issue has greater urgency as a result of the introduction of the Single Disciplinary Body on 1 January 2022.”

Under the act introducing the Single Disciplinary Body, FASEA will be wound up on 31 December 2021 and its standards-setting function transferred to the minister.

Tags: AdviceNewsRegulation

Related Posts

Move assets before death to avoid tax implications: SMSF legal specialist

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

Mitigating the impact of death benefit tax can be supported by ensuring the SMSF deed allows for the transfer of...

Investment rules can decide if crypto is a safe call

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

Before investing in cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, SMSF trustees have to consider whether it complies with the SMSF investment rules, a...

Impact of EOY shutdown on new SMSF registrants

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

The ATO has warned trustees that its end-of-year shutdowns may cause delays for new SMSF new registrants.

Comments 1

  1. Has Shoes says:
    4 years ago

    Trust FASEA to keep things complex, complicated and incapable of being properly understood.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited