An industry broker has warned a ban on personal guarantees for limited recourse borrowing arrangements by the government could see all institutions completely exit SMSF lending.
Thrive Investment Finance owner Samantha Bright told SMSF Adviser that if the government decides to implement a ban on personal guarantees as a restriction on LRBAs then this will mean the banks have no recourse if the loan defaults.
“I can’t see banks continuing to lend in this format if they didn’t have personal guarantees, to be honest, because otherwise they have no recourse basically – they’ve got to get their money back somehow,” she said.
Ms Bright said she has been informed that the banks already struggle with the use of personal guarantees to reclaim their money in situations where SMSF loans have defaulted.
“The rate of mortgages in default in these structures is extremely low, but they’re actually struggling with how they do reclaim these assets,” she said.
The lending limits imposed by APRA are already shrinking the number of lenders that offer loans to SMSFs, she said.
“It’s not that the banks don’t want to lend; they’re being forced not to lend,” she said.
“Before these changes [from APRA], we actually had more players coming into the market and looking at these products. I actually had some small lenders asking me to look at the products they were planning to release.”
Ms Bright said that while it is beneficial that the changes are helping to limit lending to the most suitable SMSF borrowers, the smaller number of lenders has meant longer turnaround times and reduced competition.
“It’s gone from having a pool of lenders to barely a puddle,” she said.
“The appetite from the lender is still there and if you jump ahead a few pages the lenders that are still doing SMSF lending are going to hit their APRA lending targets quickly so we’re not sure how that’s going to play out.”
Certain non-APRA-regulated SMSF lenders have also recently put their rates up, she said, simply because they are able to.
Ms Bright added that she is very concerned by SMSF investors who are currently buying property off the plan.
“If they’ve bought something off the plan that won’t be completed for another six months, I think they’re going to be completely shocked by what happens in six months because there may not be any lenders around by that time to settle their loan,” she said.
“I hope not, but you’ve got to be realistic. The [loan] volumes going through these lenders are huge and they’re going to be hitting their targets.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 17 Aug 2017Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 17 Aug 2017Qld succession law changes tipped to impact SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 16 Aug 2017Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tierBy Staff Reporter
- 16 Aug 2017SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 15 Aug 2017SMSF auditor disqualified for misconductBy Staff Reporter
- 15 Aug 2017Class gains market share in financial year resultsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reporting
With events-based reporting set to generate huge amounts of data, concerns have been raised about whether the ATO’s systems will be able t...read more
- Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tier
Clients hoping to accumulate a superannuation balance of $1.6 million by age 65 will need to start taking full advantage of concessional con...read more
- SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reporting
A straw poll has revealed that the majority of SMSF firms currently feel their firm is not equipped to deal with the proposed events-based r...read more
- view all