X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home Strategy

Navigating Simple TRIS Mistakes

It’s a whole new TRIS world out there, with some SMSF advisers starting to make simple mistakes that could have far-reaching implications for SMSFs.

by Shelley Banton
September 27, 2018
in Strategy
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Getting it wrong may be the difference between an SMSF being able to claim exempt current pension income (ECPI) or not. This reason alone should be enough to ensure the new TRIS rules aren’t forgotten, misunderstood or incorrectly applied. 

The TRIS Lifecycle

X

The characteristic of a TRIS has changed under the new regime. To start with, a TRIS remains a TRIS for its entire lifecycle effective from 1 July 2017.

These changes are now forcing us to think about a TRIS in an entirely different light – and how we treat it depends on whether the TRIS in the accumulation phase or retirement phase.

Accumulation phase rules

A TRIS in accumulation is easier to remember as it is effectively a retirement income stream without any of the usual retirement income stream (pension) benefits:

  1. No entitlement to claim ECPI
  2. Income from the TRIS is taxed at 15 per cent in the fund
  3. Benefits are still preserved and classified as either restricted non-preserved or unrestricted non-preserved
  4. The minimum amount must be paid with payments restricted to 10 per cent maximum
  5. The TRIS does not count toward transfer balance cap (TBC)
  6. Payments cannot be treated as lump sums for tax purposes

A member is still eligible to start a TRIS when they meet their preservation age. Remember, though, that those born before 1 July 1960 have a preservation age of 55 whereas those born on or after 1 July 1960 have a higher preservation age.

When a member subsequently meets a cashing restriction, such as reaching the retirement age of 65 or a meeting a condition of release if under age 65, then the TRIS enters the retirement phase.

Critical Documentation

The kicker is that the member must notify the trustee in writing, stating they have met a condition of release and the TRIS is now a retirement income stream.

Underestimating the importance of this step would be dangerous. Lack of documentation means that not only the ECPI claim could be disallowed, but the ATO may also apply penalties for not correctly reporting the change in the TRIS as a transfer balance cap event (regardless of whether it reported at the time or not). 

Retirement Phase Rules

The good news is that the characteristics of a retirement income stream TRIS are now more familiar. The TRIS is now eligible to receive the benefits of a retirement income stream (pension) while continuing to remain classified as a TRIS:

  1. The fund is entitled to claim ECPI
  2. Income is taxed at 0 per cent in the fund
  3. Benefits become unrestricted non-preserved
  4. The fund must pay the minimum pension with no maximum restrictions
  5. The TRIS counts towards the transfer balance cap

Moving from a TRIS to ABP Safely 

A big no-no is simply renaming a TRIS to an account-based pension (ABP) in the fund’s financial reports. And it’s this issue that is tripping up some SMSF advisers.

Making this error can be costly as it may render the fund ineligible to claim ECPI and lose the crystallisation of the tax-free/taxable components.

There is a legitimate way to change a TRIS in the retirement phase over to an ABP, but it involves documentation. Lots of it. 

The sequence of events is the TRIS must be firstly commuted back to accumulation phase before a new ABP commences. TRIS roll back documentation must be prepared along with the ABP commencement documentation.  These documents should be executed correctly, kept with the statutory records of the fund and provided to the SMSF auditor during the audit.

Actuarial Certificate Requirements

Recent changes to Super Reform and the governing rules have added an extra layer of complication in understanding whether an actuarial certificate is required.

Whether a fund in the retirement income stream phase requires an actuarial certificate is best left answered by an Actuary.

Luckily, some actuarial service providers – such as Heffron – have developed free online actuarial certificate wizards that remove the hassle of working out when a certificate is required and how to use it.

Conclusion

It’s a whole new TRIS world out there with plenty of trips and traps for even the most seasoned SMSF adviser. Keeping on top of the legislation continues to remain one of the biggest challenges in the industry.

Getting it right is critical to ensure compliance with the new rules and it may take some time, and some gentle nudging from your SMSF auditor, to keep on track in this new era.

Shelley Banton, executive general manager, technical services, ASF Audits  

Related Posts

David Saul, managing director and CEO, Saul SMSF

Deposit bonds and SMSFs: A hot market, a cold compliance shock

by David Saul managing director and CEO Saul SMSF
November 27, 2025

Australia’s property market remains one of the most competitive in the world. With scarcity driving prices higher, we’re now seeing...

Revised Div 296 super tax still misses the mark

by Naz Randeria, director, Reliance Auditing Services
November 22, 2025

The government’s revised Division 296 superannuation tax will create unnecessary complexity, drive up costs, and pave the way for a...

Abject failure to seize control of over $200M of trust assets a lesson in what not to do

by Matthew Burgess, director, View Legal
November 20, 2025

There are three foundational principles in modern Australian trust law that are universally true, and a recent legal decision highlights...

Comments 1

  1. Over Complicated O'Dwyer's Sup says:
    7 years ago

    Given all the rules for a “TRIS in Retirement Phase” are that same as an ABP, why the hell do these morons in Canberra and Over Bloody Complicated O’Dwyer’s super rules continue with this stupid technical differentiation.
    Only these technocratic bureaucratic imbeciles could be some far from reality.
    A Retirement Phase TRIS = an ABP.
    Canberra Buffoons Please stop being so dam difficult for difficult’s sake.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited