X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

NALI changes may catch advisers with an SMSF

A major SMSF service provider has warned that changes to non-arm’s length income (NALI) rules included in the government’s recently reintroduced superannuation bill are still causing confusion among trustees who are providing services to their own funds, such as advisers.

by Sarah Kendell
July 31, 2019
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The government recently reintroduced its Treasury Laws Amendment (2018 Superannuation Measures No. 1) Bill 2019 into Parliament. The new law contains measures to treat income gained from non-arm’s length expenses, such as interest rates that are less than the usual commercial rate, as NALI and therefore subject such income to a 45 per cent tax.

SuperConcepts general manager of technical services and education Peter Burgess said the measures presented problems for trustees who may be providing financial services to their own fund, which they are not allowed to charge for under current super laws.

X

“It’s still not entirely clear from the explanatory materials what services provided by trustees in their personal capacity will be caught by this new measure,” Mr Burgess said.

“For example, if a financial planner provides investment advice to their own SMSF but doesn’t charge their fund a fee for that advice, will the resulting investment income be taxed as NALI?

“Under what circumstances is the financial planner, as trustee of the fund, considered to have provided this service in their capacity as trustee and, consequently, per section 17A of the SIS Act, is prohibited from charging for the service?”

However, the SMSF Alliance’s David Busoli said the majority of funds would have little to be concerned about from the new measures, as most trustees were already very conscious of arm’s-length rules.

“Trustee education has always stressed the need for all related-party dealings to be at arm’s length — the penalties have always been significant and haven’t really changed,” Mr Busoli said.

“Though these changes expand on the definition a little to ensure that related-party expenses are levied on an arm’s-length basis, I don’t see that they will change trustee behaviour because I believe trustees already understand the need to deal on an arm’s-length basis.”

Heffron head of SMSF education and technical services Lyn Formica agreed that the new measures presented no cause for concern at the moment as they had not yet been passed into law.

“SMSFs should complete their 2019 annual return only including in non-arm’s length income those amounts which are caught by the existing law,” Ms Formica said.

“An amendment may be needed if or when the bill receives royal assent.”

Tags: News

Related Posts

Previously invalid iPhone will valid in dispute over $10m estate

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

In Wheatley v Peek NSWCA 265, the court confirmed that the iPhone note should in fact be treated as the...

‘Indirect’ financial assistance can breach s65

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

Tim Miller, head of technical and education for Smarter SMSF, said in a recent online update that trustees need to...

Dixon Advisory collapse highlights need for broad-based CSLR

FAAA launches ‘secure and compliant’ digital client identification solution

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

The Financial Advice Association Australia SafeID is a digital client identification tool that will transform the way advisers identify and...

Comments 2

  1. Anonymous says:
    6 years ago

    So ASIC is happy for Union fund investors to be charged Intra-Fund advice admin fees for advice those members may never receive, but SMSF Trustee (advisers) cannot advise themselves for free. Welcome to the parallel universe.

    Reply
  2. John says:
    6 years ago

    So an accountant providing accounting services to his own super fund and not invoicing – this is NALI? Must be joking, surely.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited