X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

More compliance concerns for accountants post 1 July

Accountants who are choosing not to become licensed under the AFSL regime after 1 July will still be subject to potential compliance traps, Perpetual has warned.

by Katarina Taurian
June 10, 2016
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

With the number of accountants applying for limited licences substantially lower than initial predictions, and a reported lag in the take-up of the authorised representative option, it seems a significant chunk of the accounting community will choose not to enter the AFSL regime after 1 July this year.

Nathan Jacobson, Perpetual’s accountants partnerships general manager, noted that even those accountants choosing not to pursue the licensing route need to be aware of their compliance obligations to avoid regulatory action.

X

“One of those is there’s policy and procedure training implications for businesses, so they can demonstrate that they’re not providing advice,” he said.

“Essentially, if ASIC comes knocking, how do you substantiate that if there is an SMSF being set up that it wasn’t you providing the advice? There will be file notes you need to keep to demonstrate that you didn’t discuss or give advice on the set-up of an SMSF, for example,” he said.

“This is a major decision. If accountants are choosing that they don’t want to become licensed then that’s actually OK, but they still need to put some important things in place.”

Accountants will also need to be cautious and selective with their referral partners. Mr Jacobson noted referral relationships are becoming an increasingly popular option for accountants.

“We’re encouraging [accountants] to understand the breadth of services that a referral partner can actually do for you. Do you want one holistic provider who can take care of your clients’ needs, or do you want to be working with multiple parties with one solution? How important to you is the independence of that advice provider? Are you comfortable with the way that they give advice?” 

Related Posts

People will hold on to assets with revised Div 296 legislation to avoid CGT

by Keeli Cambourne
December 5, 2025

In the Senate Estimates on Wednesday (3 December) Senator James Paterson said according to the Parliamentary Budget Office, superannuation members...

Daniel Butler, director, DBA Lawyers

Keep transactions arm’s length in unit trusts to avoid hefty NALI tax: legal expert

by Keeli Cambourne
December 5, 2025

Daniel Butler, director of DBA Lawyers, said if dealings are not done at arm’s length, section 295-222(5)(a) can result in...

Mary Simmons

Understanding complex behaviour next challenge for SMSF sector

by Keeli Cambourne
December 5, 2025

Mary Simmons, head of technical for the SMSF Association, told SMSF Adviser that although changing rules and technical complexity will...

Comments 3

  1. Grahame Evans says:
    9 years ago

    Good article Nathan, I would also add the concept of “arranging” if accountants don’t know what that is they can go to Reg Guide 36 Section D in particular RG 36.37 & 38 RG36.42 & 43 and Table 2. Most people “referring” are “arranging”. This is a sleeper for those who think they can ignore the new licensing environment.

    Reply
  2. Tom Fanning says:
    9 years ago

    Scaremongering

    Reply
  3. Confused bunch says:
    9 years ago

    And what about accountants that are getting limited AFSL status because their association tells them too? Yet they don’t want to actually give formal written advice because they already have a good referral relationship and / or they now realise how much work is involved in AFSL compliance even for strategy only, establishment, contributions, TRIS and pensions, death benefit noms, etc
    They will also have to be really careful they don’t continue to provide bucket loads of AFSL advice (as lots currently do) without any AFSL compliance.
    Be interesting to see if ASIC actually do anything besides media threats ??

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited