X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home Money

Investment advertising not always ‘true to label’: ASIC

The corporate watchdog has warned consumers of a surge in marketing around fixed-term investment products being compared to bank term deposits.

by Aidan Curtis
May 8, 2020
in Money
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

ASIC has cautioned consumers to take care before making investment decisions based off of fixed-term investment product advertising which claim to be term deposit alternatives or substitutes.

The regulator said it is monitoring such marketing and the entities involved as consumers have invested large sums of money as a result of the advertising.

X

“ASIC views these investment products as riskier than term deposits because they may be issued by entities that are not well capitalised, not protected by the government’s Financial Claims Scheme, and not supervised by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA),” ASIC said in a statement.

“Some are also backed by concentrated portfolios of higher-risk unlisted and illiquid assets.”

ASIC deputy chair Karen Chester advised that any investment products offering higher returns than a term deposit were more than likely higher risk.

“In the current uncertain and volatile markets, higher-risk investment products are, more than ever, not for everyone,” Ms Chester said.

“Especially for smaller investors, be they retail or wholesale, when they are not investing as part of a diversified portfolio.

“Be wary of investments that claim to be ‘like’ a ‘term deposit’. Products spruiking even a 2 or 3 percentage point higher return than a term deposit represent significantly higher risk.

“We are also seeing products offering only marginally higher returns with much higher risk profiles.”

According to Ms Chester, investment products marketed towards consumers should be “true to label”.

“Products should not be marketed as having features like low risk of loss, regular returns or easy access to withdrawals unless the product issuer has reasonable grounds to believe they have and will continue to have such features through the economic cycles,” she said.

“Product issuers need to ensure broad statements in their product marketing reconcile with the fine print in any offer document.

“When choosing an investment product, carefully assess if the product is appropriate for your circumstances, particularly when comparing relatively low-risk products such as bank term deposits with other higher return and thus higher-risk investments.”

ASIC said it recognises many consumers are seeking higher and regular returns on their investments during this time of low interest rates and market volatility, but they should know the differences between bank term deposits and fixed-term products.

“If in doubt, seek independent financial advice,” Ms Chester said.

Tags: Money

Related Posts

9 Ways You Can Invest Using SMSF

by Content Partner
October 10, 2024

Review nine smart ways to invest using an SMSF, from property and international shares to cryptocurrency and managed funds. Maximise...

Bitcoin ETFs: Riding the Wave of Success

by Global X
May 3, 2024

With the floodgates of spot Bitcoin ETFs now open, it's plausible that the new crypto bull market has commenced.

The Top Five Stocks of the Nifty Fifty’s FY2023-24

by Global X
May 1, 2024

India’s financial year 2023-24 has ended and it has been one of the best years for the Indian stock market...

Comments 2

  1. John says:
    6 years ago

    Balanced funds ranging between 50/50 and 93/7 on the growth/defensive scale hasn’t ever been an issue so I can’t see why this should be.

    Reply
  2. ASICk Joke says:
    6 years ago

    “We are also seeing products offering only marginally higher returns with much higher risk profiles.”
    According to Ms Chester, investment products marketed towards consumers should be “true to label”.

    Ahh, you mean like Industry Super Funds, who have much higher risk profiles then the naming or labelling which ASIC have NEVER investigated or publicly denounced.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited