X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Halting 12% SG rise to add $33bn to pension spending

Dumping the legislated increase in the super guarantee would add $33 billion to age pension costs over coming decades, new modelling by an actuarial firm shows.

by Tony Zhang
February 12, 2021
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Rice Warner has revealed that plans to either ditch the increase or make the legislated increases opt-in would increase taxes and leave taxpayers on the hook for tens of billions in extra welfare spending.

Industry Super Australia (ISA) said the modelling by Rice Warner analysed that if more people retire without the benefit of the legislated super boost, the pension costs would climb up billions each year, rising to an extra $33.3 billion (in today’s dollars) over the period to 2058. 

X

“Dumping the legislated increase in the SG will unequivocally leave Australians with less private savings at retirement and more reliant on the publicly funded age pension,” Industry Super Australia deputy chief executive Matthew Linden said.

Rice Warner also projected the $3.4 billion added to the Age Pension bill in 2058 will continue to grow significantly beyond that.

ISA notes that Australia’s ageing population means there are fewer taxpayers for every pensioner, making it likely future governments would need to hike taxes to meet this bulging pension burden.

“Ripping away the promised super increase leaves workers worse off, despite the increased pension costs,” ISA said.

“Today’s average-earning 30-year-old couple would still lose $160,000 in retirement income, even after the taxpayer had been forced to tip in an extra $83,000 from the pension.”

ISA also pointed to the figures from the government’s own Retirement Income Review where ditching the increase would leave all income groups with lower lifetime disposable incomes.

“A plan to make the increases optional, forcing workers to pay for their own wage increase from their retirement savings, would also add $20,000 to the tax bill of an Australian couple on average earnings, because wages are taxed at a higher rate than super contributions,” ISA said.

Tags: Aged CareNewsRegulation

Related Posts

Previously invalid iPhone will valid in dispute over $10m estate

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

In Wheatley v Peek NSWCA 265, the court confirmed that the iPhone note should in fact be treated as the...

‘Indirect’ financial assistance can breach s65

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

Tim Miller, head of technical and education for Smarter SMSF, said in a recent online update that trustees need to...

Dixon Advisory collapse highlights need for broad-based CSLR

FAAA launches ‘secure and compliant’ digital client identification solution

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

The Financial Advice Association Australia SafeID is a digital client identification tool that will transform the way advisers identify and...

Comments 3

  1. DavidL says:
    5 years ago

    [i]”forcing workers to pay for their own wage increase from their retirement savings”
    [/i]
    As opposed to the current position, which forces workers to pay for their retirement savings from their own wage increases……

    Reply
  2. wondering says:
    5 years ago

    would also add $20,000 to the tax bill of an Australian couple on average earnings.
    Over how many years is this figure calcualted.
    average earnigs of say $70,000 at the forgone 3% rise is $2,100 per annum in superannaution turned inot salary and at 32.5% tax thats an additonal tax bill for the year of $714.
    So it will take 28 years to make up that $20,000 tax figure – so much for balanced no sensalionalist reporting

    Reply
  3. J Wood says:
    5 years ago

    This article only looks at one side of the equation. Does not give the balance of how much less disposable income the workers and economy would have during their work life. Also does not consider the impact on small business.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited