Stuart Forsyth, director of McPherson Super Consulting, said the strategy “involves clients satisfying their minimum payment obligations with a payment which is taxed as a lump sum, even though they have no unrestricted benefits to take as a partial commutation”.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Mr Forsyth said prior to receiving the private binding ruling from the ATO, it was understood that the trustee had to do a partial commutation, which can only be done with unrestricted amounts.
This was due to a taxation determination that indicated if a partial commutation was done, it was then acceptable, he said.
“It never actually said you couldn’t do this, they just said what you clearly could do,” said Mr Forsyth.
Mr Forsyth said that following this information from the ATO, the strategy could potentially be available to many people within this age group, whether they have an SMSF or are a member of an APRA-regulated fund.
“We think that SMSFs will probably be the earlier adopters of it,” he said.
While some SMSFs may have already used the strategy, the SMSF trustee using the strategy now has more solid evidence it will be allowed by the ATO, according to Mr Forsyth.
Some essential steps, however, need to be followed, including documenting the commencement of TRIS with the client’s accumulation benefits if they are not already in the pension phase.
It is also important to identify the minimum and maximum payment limits for the TRIS in the current financial year.
The strategy could ensure the client will not have to pay tax on the first $195,000 of their pension drawdown between 55 and 59, Mr Forsyth said.
“It’s essentially a better tax outcome – they’ll be in the same position as if they’d retired on their 55th birthday,” he said.
Look out for SMSF Adviser’s next ‘Strategy’ bulletin for more detailed analysis of this latest development.
Read more:



Or
self employed can choose to work less than 10 hours a week – in the other 30 hours they will be at work without pay… 🙂
Is anyone aware of the specific Authorisation Number for this Private Binding Ruling?
… retired at 56th birthday”
I guess this strategy is valid only for the next 4 years.