X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Changes to defined benefit super to hit pensioners

Pensioners are being urged to remember a change to Centrelink’s income assessment in January next year could have a significant effect on the level of age pension a taxpayer receives.

by Reporter
June 5, 2015
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The change will see the level of defined benefit superannuation income that can be excluded from the age pension income test capped at 10 per cent.

Findex Group senior financial adviser Andrew Rafty said the change will commence on 1 January 2016 and affect all funded defined benefit pensions.

X

“The change is simple but can have a large effect on the level of age pension received,” said Mr Rafty.

“The proposed change has the potential to affect many current Age pensioners who have a non-assessed portion of their defined benefit pension greater than 10 per cent.”

Those who are already ‘income test critical’ will definitely be affected since the change increases the level of income assessed.

“There are also those pensioners whose level of Age pension is determined by the level of their assets i.e. asset test critical,” he said.

“These pensioners can also be affected if the extra income being assessed causes them to become income test critical.”

For couples and singles, every extra dollar assessed has the potential to decrease their age pension by 50 cents, he said.

These usually indexed pensions, Mr Rafty said, are a majority of the state-based public sector and private pensions, including pension schemes such as NSW State Super, NSW Police Super, Commonwealth Bank Officers’ Super, Uniting Church Super and HP Super.

Unfunded pension schemes would not, however, be affected by the changes to defined benefit pensions.

“Unfunded pensions are paid from our taxes via consolidated revenue and are currently 100 per cent assessed by Centrelink; examples are the Commonwealth Super Scheme (CSS) and Defence Forces Retirement and Death Benefit DFRDB,” he said.

“So the proposed changes will affect those pensioners with a high pre-83 service and/or high non-concessional contributions.”

Tags: News

Related Posts

Jason Hurst, Accurium

Maintenance versus improvement can determine where funding comes from: specialist

by Keeli Cambourne
December 1, 2025

Jason Hurst, technical superannuation adviser for Accurium, said as much as people love property, “they also love working on it,...

David Busoli, principal, SMSF Alliance

It’s not just auditors who come under scrutiny if ASIC detects a problem: adviser

by Keeli Cambourne
December 1, 2025

David Busoli, principal for SMSF Alliance, said the ATO’s stronger focus on auditing compliance “raises the temperature”, but it also...

End-of-year CRS applications processing time

by Keeli Cambourne
December 1, 2025

The tax office reminded SMSF members and trustees to be aware that some advisers claim they can get early access...

Comments 4

  1. Roger Marchant says:
    10 years ago

    My wife & I have CSS defined benefit pensions. Our combined income is $68,000 pa. Are we likely to be affected when the new rules come in on Jan 2017?
    Thank you.

    Reply
  2. Bruce James says:
    10 years ago

    Stuart A, we are also low income aged pensioners. When I joined the state super scheme, the system on which it works is all that there was available to me. I contributed the maximum allowable 9% for decades. Now the “frugality” is coming back to bite me. Between my wife and myself our old age pension is being reduced by $100 each week. Mr Morrison, we are not double dipping wealthy fat cats, thay are all in parliament.

    Reply
  3. Stuart A says:
    10 years ago

    The changes will hit “anyone” with a Defined Benefit Scheme for Centrelink purposes. We are low income pensioners, yet my wife who is an ex employee of a Private (not Public Service) company will lose $40 per f/n as a result of these changes. Its disgusting. WE can however afford to provide breastfeeding MPs with additional business class flights for nannies and family

    Reply
  4. Ron Stevens says:
    10 years ago

    Sorry to burst your bubble but…….

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited