X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Westpac ordered to pay $113m after multiple legal actions

The bank has been penalised for widespread compliance failures across multiple businesses including banking, superannuation, wealth management and insurance.

by Tony Zhang
April 26, 2022
in News
Reading Time: 4 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Justice Beach handed down his decision on Friday (22 April) in the last of six separate civil penalty proceedings filed by ASIC against Westpac in November 2021, penalising Westpac $40 million for charging fees totalling over $10.9 million to more than 11,800 deceased customers.

ASIC deputy chair Sarah Court said that over the course of 13 years, more than 70,000 customers have been affected by the bank’s failures, either by being incorrectly charged or given the wrong information.

X

“The breaches found by the court in these six cases demonstrate a profound failure by Westpac over many years and across many areas of its business to implement appropriate systems and processes to ensure its customers were treated fairly,” said Ms Court.

“Westpac, like all licensees, has an obligation to be honest and fair in its provision of financial services. Despite this, Westpac failed to prioritise and fund the systems upgrades necessary to help fulfil this obligation.”

“The sheer scale of this impact suggests that, at the time, Westpac had a culture that did not prioritise compliance,” Ms Court continued. 

Across all six matters, Justice Beach noted that systems and compliance failures were a common feature and the misconduct by Westpac was considered serious. Regarding the charging of deceased customers, Justice Beach commented that Westpac and the related entities “utterly failed to address the issues systematically”.

The six matters against Westpac concern:

Fees for no service – deceased customers

Over a 10-year period, Westpac and related entities within the Westpac group, charged over $10.9 million in advice fees to over 11,800 deceased customers for financial advice services that were not provided due to their death.

Penalty handed down by the court: $40 million

General insurance

Westpac distributed duplicate insurance policies to over 7,000 customers for the same property at the same time, including 3,899 customers since 30 November 2015, causing customers to pay for two (or more) insurance policies where they had no need for the additional policies. Westpac also issued insurance policies to 329 customers who had not consented to entering into an insurance policy.

Penalty handed down by the court: $15 million

Inadequate fee disclosure

Westpac, Securitor and Magnitude (advice businesses) charged ongoing contribution fees for financial advice to retail customers without disclosing, or properly disclosing those fees. It is estimated that over eight years, at least 25,000 customer accounts were charged at least $10.6 million in fees that were not disclosed, or properly disclosed.

Penalty handed down by the court: $6 million

Deregistered company accounts

Westpac allowed approximately 21,000 deregistered company accounts, holding approximately $120 million in funds, to remain open and continued to charge fees on those accounts. Westpac allowed funds to be withdrawn from these accounts that should have been remitted to ASIC or the Commonwealth. Justice Beach found that Westpac knew its systems were inadequate, did not fix those systems in a timely fashion and benefited from its own conduct.

Penalty handed down by the court: $20 million

Debt on sale

Westpac sold consumer credit card and flexi-loan debt to debt purchasers with incorrect interest rates. These interest rates were higher than Westpac was contractually allowed to charge on at least part of the debts, resulting in more than 16,000 customers, who were likely to be in financial distress, being overcharged interest.

Penalty handed down by the court: $12 million

Insurance in super

Westpac subsidiary BT Funds Management charged members insurance premiums that included commission payments, despite commissions having been banned under the Future of Financial Advice reforms.

Some members also paid commissions to financial advisers via their premiums even though they had elected to have the financial adviser component removed from their account. Over 9,900 BT Funds members were affected.

Penalty handed down by the court: $20 million

Customers to receive $80 million

Westpac admitted to the allegations in each of the proceedings and will remediate more than $80 million to customers. 

 

Tags: AdviceComplianceNews

Related Posts

Previously invalid iPhone will valid in dispute over $10m estate

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

In Wheatley v Peek NSWCA 265, the court confirmed that the iPhone note should in fact be treated as the...

‘Indirect’ financial assistance can breach s65

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

Tim Miller, head of technical and education for Smarter SMSF, said in a recent online update that trustees need to...

Dixon Advisory collapse highlights need for broad-based CSLR

FAAA launches ‘secure and compliant’ digital client identification solution

by Keeli Cambourne
December 16, 2025

The Financial Advice Association Australia SafeID is a digital client identification tool that will transform the way advisers identify and...

Comments 3

  1. Marisol Lakin says:
    4 years ago

    [s[s[s[s[c[c[c[color=fuchsia][/color]olor=blue][/color]olor=black][/color]olor=aqua][/color]ize=20px][/size]ize=16px][/size]ize=12px][/size]ize=10px][/size]

    Reply
  2. Beaulah Hansen says:
    4 years ago

    [s[s[s[s[c[c[c[color=fuchsia][/color]olor=blue][/color]olor=black][/color]olor=aqua][/color]ize=20px][/size]ize=16px][/size]ize=12px][/size]ize=10px][/size]

    Reply
  3. DavidL says:
    4 years ago

    $113m in penalties for 70,000 compliance breaches equates to a fine of $1,600 per instance. Seriously!?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited