The Alliance for a Fairer Retirement System (AFRS) has penned a letter to the Treasurer pointing out several problems facing retirees.
It has warned that Australia’s economic recovery is at risk because of a severe undermining to the confidence of retired investors, with Alliance spokesperson Ian Henschke considering that “retirees with market investments are being punished financially, undermining their capacity to contribute to the economic recovery”.
“With around 3.8 million Australians aged 66 and over, it is important to understand the enormous contribution this section of society has to the overall economy.”
According to Mr Henschke, “retirees are the single most important contributor to discretionary spending”.
“Retirees don’t just invest in the sharemarket, but also in their community,” he stated.
The latest figures from Challenger have revealed that older Australians are already cutting back their spending due to the COVID-19 crisis — by 27 per cent on food and 37 per cent on clothing.
Citing the finding, Mr Henschke iterated that there are good economic reasons to support retirees through the crisis, “not least because of the risk to their confidence and consumption”.
The issue of Australia’s retirement income system
But at the heart of the problem is a number of systemic failures of the retirement system, present long before the COVID-19 crisis began, the AFRS letter explained.
Problems with Australia’s retirement income system “are exacerbated in times of financial crisis”.
“The system is not able to easily account for rapid changes in investment outcomes, and this results in incomes that are either sub-par at best, or at worse, catastrophic,” the letter stated.
With many people believing the age pension does not provide an adequate level of income to support retirement, the AFRS considered it “little wonder” that retirees are striving to accumulate savings, with many seeking to avoid the complications of any dealings with the welfare system altogether.
But there are a “multitude of risks” facing retirees who choose to do so.
Here are the four risks the AFRS considers to be of most concern to older Australians:
1. Longevity risk
With Australians now living longer, there’s an increasingly higher risk that retirement savings will not last as long as the person holding the money does.
Planning to live to a certain age is risky business, especially given uncertainty around whether an individual should plan for unexpected health issues, or the need for additional care and assistance if they suffer from loss of capacity.
“For retirees, the task is to make sure their money will last to an uncertain date of death, while also dealing with life’s vicissitudes,” the letter stated.
2. Inflation risk
This refers to the way that money’s purchasing power will decline due to the effects of inflation.
It’s of serious concern to retirees, where even low rates can seriously erode a retired individual’s financial wellbeing, especially where that person lives on a fixed income.
While retirees have managed this risk through investment in growth assets, this does expose people to further risk.
Citing Dr Doug Tarek, the AFRS highlighted that inflation and declining interest rates now mean retirees must hold substantially more savings to achieve the same level of income.
The following example was provided:
“If a couple bought an annuity of $1 million in 2019, it would have purchased an income stream of $44,250 for life, indexed to inflation. The interest rate in October 2019 was 1.5 per cent. If they had bought an annuity in 2011 with the same $1 million, it would have generated an income stream of $54,300. Today, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the interest rate is 0.25 [of a percentage point] and so, that annuity is now less than the Age Pension.”
3. Market risk
At the best of times, the market price of assets can be affected by political and economic events outside of an investor’s control.
The inherent liquidity of shares makes the stock market the most volatile market, making it risky for retirees, due to their ability to “seriously reduce retirement savings”.
Despite this, their ability to outperform other investments does make them highly recommended for long-term investment as part of a balanced investment strategy, the AFRS considered.
While a diversified portfolio does reduce volatility risks, it will bring lower returns, increasing an individual’s exposure to inflation risk and longevity risk.
4. Legislative risk
The final risk factor explored by the AFRS relates to legislative risk, which affects all retirees:
“All citizens are exposed to adverse legislative changes, but retirees are generally not in [a] position to return to work to rebuild their nest eggs if unexpected legislative changes seriously affect their projected retirement income.”
According to the letter, the management of legislative risk is only possible through advocacy — and even then, this is not always successful.
The Treasury was advised that governments can help manage legislative risk by ensuring long lead-in times for changes to take effect, as well as through quarantining or grandfathering retirees from any proposed changes.
The AFRS is composed of a number of organisations, including the Association of Independent Retirees, the Australian Investors Association, National Seniors Australia and the Australian Shareholders’ Association.
Yes, we really need to be concerned about the fate of retirees who own their own homes, have $1m to purchase an annuity, pay no tax, receive a refund of imputation credits which they should not even be entitled to. These are the unsung victims of the covid-19 pandemic! Lets not forget that we closed down the economy mainly to save the elderly, and the effect that has on young people who were at very little risk of dying. It seems to me that the biggest risk to the retirees referred to in the above article is that they might need to drawn down on a bit of their capital to get through the crisis! And they should seriously think about their tax free status moving forward. Time to pay it back Boomer!
The age pension is too generous. It show be income tested dollar for dollar instead of encouraging superannuitants to claim part pensions up the income scale.
And where is the incentive to save in that proposal?
You have got to be kidding me! It clearly shows that you have never had to live off the age pension alone! The age pension should be determined based on your contribution to the economy (i.e. how much tax you paid during your working years), to discourage people from living off the government their whole lives! This would obviously exclude people whom have a genuine reason for not being able to work, i.e. disability, etc.