Further ATO clarification is required in relation to the difficulties and uncertainties associated with flexi-pensions in the post 1 July 2017 environment.
This article considers the impact of the transfer balance cap provisions on flexi pensions, being pensions that comply with reg 1.06(6) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (Cth) (‘SISR’).
Importantly, flexi pensions do not fall within the definition of a capped defined benefit income stream for the purpose of the transfer balance cap provisions. Accordingly, the modified transfer balance cap provisions do not apply these pensions. Thus, flexi pensions that exceed the $1.6 million transfer balance cap will need to be partially commuted to the extent permitted by superannuation law, the documents recording the payment of the pension and the fund deed to avoid excess transfer balance tax from 1 July 2017.
There is significant uncertainty, however, regarding the best way to manage these pensions where:
- The pension is partially commuted to the extent permitted by superannuation law, and the remaining pension balance exceeds the transfer balance cap; and
- The pension is commuted in full and the commuted amount exceeds the amount that can be commuted under superannuation law.
Subject to the governing rules of the fund and the documents recording the commencement of the flexi pension, flexi pensions can generally be partially commuted up to the amount set out in schedule 1B of the SISR. This commutation amount can then be applied to the payment of an account-based pension, paid as a lump sum to the member, or retained within accumulation phase.
The uncertainty then arises regarding the remaining balance of the flexi pension, particularly where the remaining amount exceeds the member’s transfer balance cap.
An approach that is consistent with both the relevant provisions of superannuation and tax laws is to commute the balance of the flexi pension and credit the commuted amount to a pension reserve held for the benefit of the member. This reserve could then be applied to fund the payment of an account-based pension to the member (subject to transfer balance cap considerations).
This approach is consistent with private binding ruling (‘PBR’) (authorisation number 1012206212244). In the specified circumstances of the ruling, a pension reserve amount (that arose from the excess amount over the relevant commutation threshold upon commuting the flexi pension in full), could be applied to commence an account‑based pension for a member without being deemed to be a concessional contribution for tax purposes as the requirements of the exception under the Income Tax Assessment Regulations 1997 (Cth) (‘ITAR’) were satisfied.
While the PBR relates solely to the relevant taxpayer, it supports this interpretation of the legislation, and the ability to apply the amount from a pension reserve created with the commuted amount of a flexi pension to fund an account-based pension, without the allocation being treated as a concessional contribution for tax purposes.
Commuting a flexi pension and commencing an account-based pension
We now consider in further detail the process for commuting the balance of a flexi pension and commencing an account-based pension.
Concessional contributions for a financial year are comprised of amounts listed under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) (‘ITAA 1997’) and in particular, concessional contributions include an amount that is allocated to a member in accordance with the specified conditions.
The ITARs provide that an amount allocated from a reserve to a member is treated as a concessional contribution unless an exception applies.
Generally, where an amount of 5 per cent or more is allocated from a reserve to a member’s account, this is deemed to be a concessional contribution for tax purposes and taxed accordingly.
There is an exception, however, where an amount is allocated from a reserve used solely for the purpose of enabling the fund to discharge all or part of its liabilities as soon as they become due in respect of a pension that is payable by the fund, and on the commutation of the pension, the commutated amount is allocated to the member receiving the pension to allow the member to commence another pension, as soon as practicable.
Where a reserve is used solely for the purpose of enabling the fund to discharge all or part of its liabilities in respect of superannuation income stream benefits that are payable by the fund at that time, an amount allocated from the reserve will not fall within the definition of a concessional contribution.
Therefore, subject to the fund deed and transfer balance cap considerations, the trustee could commute the balance of a flexi pension and allocate it to a pension reserve. An account-based pension could then be commenced from this reserve without being treated for tax purposes as a concessional contribution.
Minimum member benefits
Further support for the view outlined above is the 2004 amendments to ensure the protection of minimum member benefits.
From 2004, it is not possible to allocate minimum member benefits to a general reserve account within the fund. Further, the effect of the amendment to the legislation in 2004 is to provide that all member benefits are minimum member benefits under the SISR. Therefore, the effect is that all benefits must be maintained for the benefit of the respective member. Accordingly, minimum member benefits cannot be forfeited to a reserve.
On this basis, it is arguable that the balance of the flexi pension on cessation is a minimum member benefit that must be allocated to the member. This is particularly relevant where the flexi pension was commenced with benefits contributed by or on behalf of the specific member, as will generally be the case.
ATO clarification required
A recent PBR has been released (authorisation number 1051235254460), where the ATO has taken an alternative interpretation of the law, and thus the view expressed in various PBRs is inconsistent. There is otherwise very little ATO guidance on issues relating to flexi pensions.
There is a risk that the ATO may take the view (as set out in the recent PBR) that:
Whilst there was an amount remaining in the reserve following the commutation of the flexi pensions, the pensions ceased at that time, and consequently, the reserve was no longer a reserve being used to enable the Fund to discharge its liabilities in respect of the payment of any pensions.
This view, however, does not appear to address the scenario provided for under the regulations where a flexi pension is commuted, and the commuted amount is applied as soon as practicable to commence another income stream. Thus, it is implicit that a flexi pension can cease, and the amount allocated to the member receiving the flexi pension to commence another income stream commenced from that commuted amount without giving rise to a concessional contribution.
Given the difficulties and uncertainty associated with flexi pensions from 1 July 2017, further ATO clarification is required regarding flexi pensions and the transfer balance cap provisions. Accordingly, we recommend legal advice is sought before taking any steps to commute or vary a flexi pension in part or in full.
By Rebecca James, special counsel, DBA Lawyers
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2017Top investment mechanisms for tax savings revealedBy Staff Reporter
- 21 Aug 2017SMSFA appoints high-profile Australian as patronBy Staff Reporter
- 21 Aug 2017Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2017Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- view all
- Top investment mechanisms for tax savings revealed
While super remains one of the most tax-effective ways to save for retirement, if you’re unable to stay within caps then it may be worth c...read more
- view all