SMSFs under $1m not cost effective
SMSFs are “astronomically expensive” and inefficient for funds with under $200,000, according to an superannuation industry consultant.
SMSFs are “astronomically expensive” and inefficient for funds with under $200,000, according to an superannuation industry consultant.
SMSF trustees may be putting their retirement savings at risk through poor planning, according to a wealth advisory group.
Families looking for an overall 'family wealth' approach to superannuation may form part of the reason for recent rapid growth...
The self-managed super fund (SMSF) sector saw continued solid growth in 2011/2012, with sound investment and falling costs, according to...
The proposed limited licence allowing accountants to advise on self-managed super funds (SMSFs), replacing the accountants' exemption, could effectively exempt...
Financial advisers will be able to leverage scaled advice provisions and technological advances to target the self-managed super fund (SMSF)...