Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
subscribe to our newsletter

SMSFA backs adviser exam changes

smsf association smsf
By Keeli Cambourne
17 January 2024 — 1 minute read

The SMSF Association has welcomed the proposed exposure draft amendments regarding the financial adviser examinations.

In its submission to the government on the Corporations (Relevant Providers – Education and Training Standards) Amendment (2024 Measures No 1) Determination 2024 (Exposure Draft), the SMSFSA said the proposed amendments will deliver efficiencies.

The proposed changes would see the removal of short answer questions and an increase in multiple choice questions, as well as removing the requirement that only provisional relevant providers and existing advisers can sit the exam.

The draft explanatory statement said that exams based on multiple choice questions “create efficiencies” by enabling computer marking to replace manual marking.

The SMSFA stated the proposed changes to the exam questions so that they only comprise multiple choice questions, will reduce exam administration costs and improve response times for exam candidates to receive their results.

“Our own experience with the conversion of written question exams to multiple choice exams, shows these efficiencies can be achieved without compromising exam standards or lowering the bar in terms of testing relevant knowledge and skills,” it stated.

“Removing the requirement that a person must have already met the qualifications standard before sitting the exam, is a commonsense amendment that will provide greater flexibility and accessibility for future advisers seeking to sit the exam.”

Furthermore, the SMSFA said the proposed changes will enable candidates to sit the exam at a time that better suits their circumstances, including those located in remote and rural areas who may be required to travel some distance to an exam centre.

“The costs associated with the administration of the exams have significantly increased since the transition of their administration from FASEA to ASIC. We understand that this is in part due to lower numbers of exam candidates,” the submission continued.

“In 2019, the exam fee was $597 per sitting and is currently $1,500 per sitting. These increases are not insignificant, are not sustainable and risk creating a barrier to entry. We anticipate, and look forward to, the proposed exposure draft amendments resulting in a substantial reduction in the exam fee.”

The SMSFA submission is in line with the Financial Advice Association Australia, which also said it is in favour of the government’s proposed changes.

The FAAA backed making the exam completely multiple choice, removing restrictions on who can sit the exam, and allowing students to sit the exam at a stage that is suitable for them.

FAAA chief executive Sarah Abood said that the proposed changes will make the exam process more flexible and more affordable for candidates.

Meanwhile, ASIC pushed back the date of the first exam for 2024 to 26 March to allow sufficient time to implement the required changes and ensure all candidates are held to the same standard.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning