X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Major institutions pay almost $2bn for financial advice misconduct

Australia’s largest financial institutions have forked out nearly $2 billion in compensation in the resulting fallout from financial advice-related misconduct.

by Tony Zhang
August 5, 2021
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Six of Australia’s largest banking and financial services institutions have paid or offered a total of $1.86 billion in compensation, as at 30 June 2021, to customers who suffered loss or detriment because of fees-for-no-service misconduct or non-compliant advice.

ASIC reported that, as of 30 June 2021, AMP, ANZ, CBA, Macquarie, NAB and Westpac have paid a total of $1.86 billion in compensation, $620.9 million of which was paid between 1 January and 30 June.

X

This includes $620.9 million paid or offered by the institutions between 1 January and 30 June 2021.

The largest figure paid or offered came from Westpac ($578,441,530) that was paid to 3,001 customers, while AMP paid or offered $230,418,976 to 2,961 customers.

Overall, 1,066,493 customers were paid or offered compensation.

AMP, ANZ, CBA, Macquarie, NAB and Westpac (the institutions) undertook the review and remediation programs to compensate affected customers as a result of two major ASIC reviews.

“ASIC commenced the reviews to look into the extent of failure by the institutions to deliver ongoing advice services to financial advice customers who were paying fees to receive those services,” ASIC said.

“The regulator looked at how effectively the institutions supervised their financial advisers to identify and deal with ‘non-compliant advice’, for example, personal advice provided to a retail client by an adviser who did not comply with the relevant conduct obligations in the Corporations Act, and the obligations to give appropriate advice or to act in the best interests of the clients, at the time of the advice.”

Back in October 2016, the regulator had released REP 499 describing systemic failures in the advice divisions of AMP, ANZ, CBA and NAB, as well as some of their product issuers. 

These included the failure to ensure provision of ongoing advice services to customers who paid fees to receive those services (fees for no service), the failure of advisers to provide those services, and the failure of product issuers to switch off advice fees of customers who did not have a financial adviser.

ASIC then released REP 515 in March 2017 outlining findings from its review of how AMP, ANZ, CBA, NAB and Westpac identified and dealt with non-compliant advice by their advisers between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2015 and the development and implementation by these institutions of a framework for the large-scale review and remediation of customers who received non-compliant advice in the same period.

Since the publication of this report, ASIC said it has been monitoring the ongoing implementation of the institutions’ customer review and remediation programs.

Tags: AdviceNews

Related Posts

Meg Heffron

What was the biggest win the sector had in the year?

by Keeli Cambourne
December 30, 2025

Peter Burgess, CEO, SMSF Association The government’s decision not to proceed with the taxation of unrealised capital gains. This decision...

Top 5 news stories for 2025

by Keeli Cambourne
December 30, 2025

May 1, 2025  Unrealised capital gains tax risks gutting SMSFs and investor confidence: expert warns  Taxing unrealised gains will change the way Australians invest, an industry executive has warned, as it would reduce the...

Strategy

Top 5 strategy stories 2025

by Keeli Cambourne
December 30, 2025

March 13, 2025  CGT concessions 15-year exemption   Nicholas Ali, head of SMSF technical services, Neo Super  With the ever-reducing superannuation...

Comments 1

  1. Albert says:
    4 years ago

    I wonder how these amounts fit into pay for service???

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2026 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited