Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

Retirement Income Review highlights ‘inequity’ issues with tax concessions, bequests

parliament house sideview
Miranda Brownlee
20 November 2020 — 3 minute read

While the Retirement Income Review concluded that Australia’s retirement income system is effective, sound and broadly sustainable, it has outlined concerns around the size of death benefits from superannuation and argued that better targeting tax concessions may improve equity in the system.

While the Retirement Income Review concluded that Australia’s retirement income system is effective, sound and broadly sustainable, it has outlined concerns around the size of death benefits from superannuation and argued that better targeting tax concessions may improve equity in the system.

The Morrison Government on Friday released the Independent Retirement Income Review Final Report, which examined the three pillars of Australia’s retirement income system including the Age Pension, superannuation and voluntary savings including home ownership.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Final Report found that Australia’s income system overall was effective and that its costs were sustainable. However it identified a number of areas in the system requiring improvement.

The reported noted that the system is complex and that misconceptions and low financial literacy have resulted in people not adequately planning for their retirement or making the most of their assets when in retirement.

“Adding to complexity is the interaction with other systems, such as the aged care and the tax systems. People need better information, guidance and good, affordable advice tailored to their needs,” it stated.

It also argued that a clear objective for the system is needed to held guide policy, improve understanding and to provide a framework for assessing performance of the system.

Inequity issues

The review also considered the performance of the retirement income system in relation to equity.

The report noted that there are very large superannuation balances in the system that were built up under previous higher contribution caps and are expected to stay in the system for several decades.

“At June 2018, there were more than 11,000 people with a balance in excess of $5 million.These people receive very large tax concessions on their earnings. A superannuation balance of $5 million can achieve annual earnings tax concessions of around $70,000,” the report stated.

Overall, superannuation tax concessions increase inequity in the retirement income system, while the age pension helps offset inequity in retirement.

“However, the combination of a system where people on higher incomes achieve the largest superannuation balances, combined with tax concessions on superannuation contributions and earnings, means that higher-income earners receive more Government support than other income groups over their lifetime,” it noted.

“Further improvements in targeting superannuation tax concessions would improve the equity of the retirement income system.”

The report suggested that making changes to earnings tax concessions would increase the system’s cost effectiveness.

“Changes to superannuation earnings tax concessions would improve equity, and in turn boost public support for the system,” the report stated.

The report also found that the retirement income system does not appear to be delivering an appropriate standard of living for many retiree renters.

“Although Commonwealth Rent Assistance provides additional support to retiree renters, it is far below the level that would bridge the gap in their living standards compared to home owners,” it said.

The report also noted the significant size of inheritances in the system and that most people die with the majority of the wealth they had when they retired.

“They are not distributed equally and increase inequity within the generation that receives the bequests,” it said.

“If this does not change, as the superannuation system matures, superannuation balances will be larger when people die, as will inheritances. Superannuation is intended to fund living standards of retirees, not to accumulate wealth to pass to future generations.”

Response to the final report

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg said the review “provides confirmation of the policy direction being pursued by the Morrison Government with respect to the importance of increasing the efficiency of the superannuation system and lifting home ownership rates – both identified as key drivers of an adequate retirement income”.

“The government will continue to carefully consider the observations made in the Review together with the findings of related reviews including the Aged Care Royal Commission and remaining recommendations of the Productivity Commission’s report into superannuation,” said Mr Frydenberg.

Commenting on the report, CPA Australia general manager of external affairs Dr Jane Rennie said the suggestion that Australia’s existing retirement system is fine, glosses over some known deficiencies.

“We are concerned that the government will use the report as justification for maintaining the superannuation guarantee at its current level,” said Dr Rennie.

She noted that a signficant cohort of Australians is not achieving what CPA Australia believes is an adequate retirement income and that it’s arguably going backwards.

“The adequacy of retirement incomes has been slipping in Australia in recent years. Some demographics are increasingly vulnerable, such as older single women who are the fastest growing cohort of homeless in Australia today,” she said.

SMSF Association chief executive John Maroney said some of the areas for improvement identified in the report have also been previously highlighted by the association.

“It’s to be hoped this report will provide the necessary evidence to ensure that many of the suggestions relating to making the SMSF sector less complex can be implemented,” said Mr Maroney.

“The Review also issued a fresh call for superannuation to have a clear Objective to guide policy, improve understanding and provide a framework for assessing its performance. Our submission also made having an objective a priority, so it is pleasing the Review has endorsed this position.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Retirement Income Review highlights ‘inequity’ issues with tax concessions, bequests
parliament house sideview
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.