Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
subscribe to our newsletter

Electronic execution measures expected to clarify case law issues

Paul Derham
By mbrownlee
16 November 2020 — 2 minute read

One law firm is hopeful that measures proposed by the federal government to make the temporary instrument applying to section 127 of the Corporations Act will clarify many of the disparities currently existing between different court cases on electronic execution of documents.

Holley Nethercote partner Paul Derham said there are a number of court cases that look at the proper execution of documents where a company signed under a section 127 clause electronically.

“Some of these cases say it’s fine and some of them say it’s not and that it needs to be in writing,” Mr Derham said, speaking at Smarter SMSFs’ SMSF Virtual Day.

“There are many highly regarded lawyers out there that would say that you can sign right now using a platform like DocuSign or Adobe Sign using a s 127 clause and it will be valid, but do you really want to risk it?”

Mr Derham said at this stage, this is still not the generally accepted provision, with many of the banks yet to take that view.

“[However], I think that’s all going to change and the [new] law is going to clarify that. The emergency legislation has been well received and there’s a push to make it permanent,” he said.

The emergency legislation for electronic execution and electronic witnessing for companies, he said, is currently in place to 21 March next year. However, the new legislation is likely to be in by that point, which will be indefinite.

Mr Derham also reminded SMSF professionals that there are slightly different types of relief in place for different states.

“In Queensland, there is electronic execution and witnessing that’s allowable. Youve got to have a special witness, so it’s got to be like a lawyer or a justice of the peace, you cant just use your neighbor to witness a document under these rules, and so again, it only applies to certain documents, but it’s fairly wide in Queensland,” Mr Derham explained.

“In Victoria, its very wide. You can remote witness and remote sign in Victoria, but you need special wording, the witness needs a declaration with special wording, youve got to make sure youve jumped through a few hoops around consent and those type of things. The Victorian relief goes until April next year, and that might be extended because COVID is going for longer than everyone thought.”

In NSW, there are some provisions allowing electronic signatures, but its mostly around electronic witnessing, he said.

“Sometimes you still need a wet signature, and so in NSW, it’s not quite as broad but NSW has got a pilot now going until the end of next year and if it works, theyre going to allow remote witnessing, so thats through a webcam,” Mr Derham said.

“A little tip also: If you ever do remote witnessing, make sure you record it, so youve got it on file, that it was witnessed properly and the witness has to actually see the person signing.”

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning