X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

Pension payment guidance causing confusion for mixed-account SMSFs

While the ATO has been clear that pension payments cannot be reclassified in response to reduced pension minimums, it is less unclear what SMSF clients are able to do where they have both accumulation and pension accounts in the one fund, says a technical expert.

by Miranda Brownlee
September 10, 2020
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

SMSF Association deputy chief executive Peter Burgess said following the reduction to minimum pension amounts for most pensions announced in March, some SMSF clients have inquired whether they’re able to reclassify payments made before March as lump-sum commutations. 

Speaking at the Tax Institute National Superannuation Conference this year, Mr Burgess said the ATO has been very clear that you cannot reclassify payments that have previously been paid as a pension.

X

“[This] also extends to situations where clients may have made an election at the beginning of the financial year that they wanted any payments in excess of the minimum to be treated as a commutation,” Mr Burgess stated.

“So, even if the client had put one of those elections in place at 1 July 2019, they can’t now go back and reclassify amounts that have been paid as a pension as a lump-sum commutation.”

However, there are other situations, he explained, where the regulator’s view in regard to benefit payments made before the reduction in pension minimums was announced is less clear.

“Situations have been raised with us where the client might have an accumulation account and a pension account in the one fund. It’s quite common in those situations that they don’t make a decision till the end of the year as to what amounts have come out of the accumulation account and what amounts have been taken from the pension account,” he explained.

“Now in those situations, I think it’s arguable that there hasn’t been a reclassification of pension payments, although the ATO may see that differently.”

Tags: News

Related Posts

Div 296 draft legislation released for consultation

by Keeli Cambourne
December 19, 2025

The draft landed this morning with little fanfare and a consultation period that closes on 16 January 2026. The government...

Unit trusts a concern regarding compliance breaches

by Keeli Cambourne
December 19, 2025

Tim Miller, head of technical and education for Smarter SMSF, said on a recent webinar for SuperGuardian that the lack...

Leigh Mansell

Opt out rules available for SG payments

by Keeli Cambourne
December 19, 2025

Leigh Mansell, director SMSF technical and education services for Heffron, said in a recent technical update, that the opt out...

Comments 2

  1. Elaine says:
    5 years ago

    I think the ATO has made it clear that the allocation should be decided before the money is withdrawn, regardless of the account it comes from. Having said that, the ATO has no idea how the real world works. Clients withdraw whatever they want and don’t give it a second thought. It is left to the accountant to determine how to allocate the payments when the client gets around to sending in their work the following year. With luck, they will have discussed it before taking money out, and have appropriate minutes in place, but that doesn’t always happen.

    Reply
  2. Anonymous says:
    5 years ago

    The matter is more complicated when administrators using the the latest “does everything for you software” auto allocate benefit payments to pensions. In the majority of instances the processing rules or AI will have been set and remained unchanged post the pension rate reduction and or the ATO’s announced position.

    Administrators may wish to change the allocations. But can they. What will the auditors position on the re-allocations be? Of course there will no audit issues with in-house auditors

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited